Mattawa, ON · Charitable organization
Mattawa Rutherglen Pastoral Charge
Due to the pandemic all 'Programs' were suspendeded
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Church Of Canada | C$747 |
| Mattawa And Area Food Bank | C$664 |
| World Vision | C$588 |
| MATTAWA General Hospital | C$30 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$664 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- WVWorld Vision2× · 2017–2020 · C$5k · revenue +6%
- UCUnited Church of Canada6× · 2019–2024 · C$4k · revenue +5%
- MHMattawa Hospital2× · 2022–2024 · C$80 · revenue +5%
Funded once
- UCUnited Church of Canada Mission & Service Fundone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +21%
- UCUnited Church of Canadaone grant, 2018 · C$2k
- WVWorld Visionone grant, 2021 · C$468
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.