Concord, ON · Private foundation
Marner Assist Foundation
We support organizations geared towards children and youth in the following areas of social care health education as well as supporting environmental causes.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k10 grants · C$36k
- C$10k–50k14 grants · C$262k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$103k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| London Health Sciences Foundation | C$52,500 |
| Second Harvest | C$50,000 |
| London Health Sciences Foundation | C$45,000 |
| Second Harvest Food Support Committee | C$38,500 |
| Lumenus Foundation | C$25,000 |
| Near North District School Board | C$23,606 |
| Muskoka Woods Youth Foundation | C$20,000 |
| The Salvation Army | C$20,000 |
| The Salvation Army | C$20,000 |
| One Voice One Team | C$10,000 |
| 13th Round Fight for Life | C$10,000 |
| Canadian Tire Jump Start Charities | C$10,000 |
| True North Aid | C$10,000 |
| 360 Kids | C$10,000 |
| 13th Round Fight for Life | C$10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 1% of grant dollars (C$8k). The 99% that went abroad (C$653k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 99% of all-years giving (C$653k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$129k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LHLondon Health Sciences Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · C$123k
- SHSecond Harvest Food Support Committee3× · 2022–2024 · C$92k
- LFLumenus Foundation3× · 2022–2024 · C$75k
Funded once
- PTPathways to Education Canadaone grant, 2022 · C$20k
- SFSickKids Foundationone grant, 2022 · C$15k
- TFToronto Fresh Air Foundationone grant, 2022 · C$10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.