Truro, NS · Charitable organization
Maritime District Conference District Office
The district office administers and supports the member churches of the denomination in establishing new congregations assisting churches providing leadership to the churches in the district conducting conferences and conventions granting credentials as determined by the by-laws of the organization providing ministry to children…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$13k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$15k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$77k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada | C$76,553 |
| Faith Tabernacle | C$15,000 |
| Aboriginal Bible Academy | C$5,000 |
| Institut Biblique du Quebec | C$4,920 |
| Glad Tidings Pentecostal Church | C$3,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA7× · 2017–2024 · C$599k · revenue +22%
- FTFAITH TABERNACLE2× · 2023–2024 · C$35k · revenue +5%
- EAEVANGEL ASSEMBLY2× · 2018–2021 · C$17k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- CCCENTRE CHRETIEN EVANGELIQUEone grant, 2019 · C$15k · revenue -29%
- CCCORRIDOR COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2021 · C$12k · revenue +9%
- LOLIGHTHOUSE OF CAPE BRETONone grant, 2022 · C$10k · revenue -94%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunday school for all ages sunday worship services bible study youth and family events.
Prayer meetings Bible studies Sunday morning worship
Sunday school for all ages sunday am & pm worship services bible study youth and family events christian school.
Sunday school for all ages sunday worship services bible study youth and family
Church Services Sunday School Bible Study Children's Ministry Youth Ministry Support of missionaries and evangelism. provide community support
Sunday school for all ages sunday am & pm worship services bible study youth and family
Worship services prayer and bible study
Sunday worship bible study children's sunday school
Church services youth programs children's programs community events women's/men's ministries
Worship services - bible study - sunday school
Weekly church meetings and fellowship on sundays. mid-week bible study weekly youth activity
Conduct worship services sunday school bible study youth events.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evangel Assembly and the most unlike its peers is Aboriginal Bible Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds Master's College & Seminary ↗
- Who funds FAITH TABERNACLE ↗
- Who funds EVANGEL ASSEMBLY ↗
- Who funds CENTRE CHRETIEN EVANGELIQUE ↗
- Who funds CALVARY TEMPLE CHARLOTTETOWN ↗
- Who funds CORRIDOR COMMUNITY CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OF CAPE BRETON ↗
- Who funds EVANGEL ASSEMBLY ↗
- Who funds CALVARY TEMPLE ↗
- Who funds ISLAND GOSPEL TABERNACLE ↗
- Who funds GLAD TIDINGS ↗
- Who funds SYDNEY PENTECOSTAL CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Aboriginal Bible Academy ↗
- Who funds Centre Evangelique Nehemie ↗
- Who funds Institut Biblique du Quebec ↗
- Who funds BOOM ROAD PENTECOSTAL CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LIFESONG CHRISTIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Eglise de la Grace Church ↗
- Who funds FULL GOSPEL PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLY OF ANTIGONISH ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.