Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
Manitoba Safety Council
Delivering safety training courses and seminars in road safety occupational health and safety and community safety within the province of manitoba
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Siloam Mission | C$800 |
| Winnipeg Kids Foundation | C$309 |
| Downtown Conmmunity Safety Partnership | C$200 |
| Threads of Life | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$309 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SMSiloam Mission3× · 2022–2024 · C$2k · revenue +29%
- AFAssociation for Workplace Tragedy Family Support3× · 2022–2024 · C$900 · revenue +45%
- DCDowntown Community Safety Partnership3× · 2022–2024 · C$900
Funded once
- MSManta Swim Club Winnipegone grant, 2022 · C$400
- OROperation Red Nose - Manta Swim Clubone grant, 2023 · C$400
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.