Ninette, MB · Charitable organization
Manhattan Beach Retreat Centre
Organization and operation of camps to promote revival evangelism discipleship and fellowship.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA | C$13,931 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$14k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- PAPentecostal Assemblies of Canada3× · 2017–2021 · C$33k · revenue +22%
- LOLOADS OF LOVE2× · 2022–2023 · C$16k · revenue -26%
- TKThe Killarney Food Bank2× · 2020–2023 · C$5k · revenue -37%
Funded once
- FSFIVE STONES CHURCHone grant, 2019 · C$14k · revenue -53%
- RNRAN Networkone grant, 2023 · C$13k · revenue +2%
- HOHOME OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIESone grant, 2020 · C$9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.