Skip to content

Trois-Pistoles, QC · Charitable organization

Maison Le Puits Inc.

Efectuer la promotion de l'action bénévole et la coordination d'une assistance physique aux personnes défavorisées de la région des basques.

C$7k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$538k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE NDDNC$5,000
FONDATION DU RSSS DES BASQUESC$600
CENTRE FEMME CETHERINE LEBLONDC$300
MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DES BASQUESC$300
LES AMIS DE L'ARTC$250
PATRIMOINE DU TOURISME RELIGIEUXC$200
FONDATION DE LA SANTÉ RDLC$200
SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCERC$200
FONDATION DES MALADIES DU COEURC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3k · 4 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

C$3k
C$700

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+61%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DU RSSS DES BASQUES
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$1k · revenue +77%
  • FD
    Fondation de la Santé RDL
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$1k · revenue +27%
  • SC
    SOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$500 · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CD
    Centre d'action bénévole des Basquesgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$300 · revenue +61%
  • MD
    Maison de la Famillegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$300 · revenue +45%
  • SA
    Société Alzheimergraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +62%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-La-Salette
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Sauveur
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Baie-Trinite
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Famille
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Francois-De-Sales
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Bon-Conseil
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Norbert
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is SociÉTÉ Alzheimer Du Bas-Saint-Laurent and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Cancer Society - SociÉTÉ Canadienne Du Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE NDDN — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFONDATION DU RSSS DES BASQUES — C$1,250 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFondation de la Santé RDL — C$1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DU CANCER — C$500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentre d'action bénévole des Basques — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMaison de la Famille — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE DES BASQUES — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE FEMME CETHERINE LEBLOND — C$300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLES AMIS DE L'ART — C$250 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetPATRIMOINE DU TOURISME RELIGIEUX — C$200 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetSociété Alzheimer — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation Défi EverestQC9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation Défi Everest · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 118845114:2020-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Maison Le Puits’ filings →