Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Levis, QC · Charitable organization

Magasin Général de Lévis

Aider les personnes vulnérables ayant une situation économique précaire en leurs offrant des biens matériels essentiels à la vie de tous les jours.

C$6k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$268
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LE GRENIERC$2,251
CENTRE DE PÉDIATRIEC$860
LE TREMPLINC$687
JONCTION POUR ELLEC$596
ALLIANCE JEUNESSEC$485
CONFÉRENCE NOTRE-DAMEC$268
CONFÉRENCE ST-DAVIDC$167
CENTRE AIDE ET PRÉVENTION JEUNESSE DE LÉVISC$107
LE SERVICE D'ENTRAIDE CHARNYC$90
CONNEXION EMPLOIC$60
CONFÉRENCE CHRIST-ROI (LA SOCIÉTÉ DE SAINT-VINCENT DE PAUL)C$41
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$33k · 17 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
3

Total granted

C$33k
C$647

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$687 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LG
    LE GRENIER
    4× · 2020–2023 · C$9k · revenue +38%
  • AJ
    ALLIANCE JEUNESSE
    4× · 2020–2023 · C$6k · revenue +51%
  • LT
    LE TREMPLIN
    3× · 2020–2022 · C$4k · revenue +172%

Funded once

  • SS
    SOCIÉTÉ SAINT-VINCENT-DE-PAUL DE QUEBEC
    one grant, 2017 · C$500 · revenue -8%
  • RN
    RESSOURCES NAISSANCES
    one grant, 2022 · C$130 · revenue +24%
  • MS
    MAISON SOUS LES ARBRESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$17 · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Service D'entraide De Pintendre

Service de soutien à domicile accompagnement tramsport popote roulante aide à l'épicerie. 100 bénévoles plus de 6000 heures de bénévolat par année.

—
2
Service D'entraide St-ÉTienne

Services offerts aux résidents du secteur saint-etienne-de-lauzon (ville de lévis): 1) entraide sociale tel que transport accompagnement des ainés (assistance) 2) aide alimentaire 3) comptoir de vente de vêtements et autres articles à…

—
3
Service D'entraide De Saint-Lambert-De-Lauzon

L'organisme offre des services à domicile aux personnes âgées ou en perte d'autonomie un service de dépannage alimentaire et vestimentaire

—
4
L'entraide Chez Nous

Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile

—
5
Equipe Service Quartier St-Vincent-De-Paul

Dépannage alimentaire d'urgence comptoir alimentaire hebdomadaire aide vestimentaire aide aux fournitures scolaires. référencement aux nouveaux arrivants. panier de provisions à la période des fêtes

—
6
L'envol S.R.T. Service De Retour Au Travail
—
7
Le Repas du Passant

Service qui favorisent la sécurité alimentaire

—
8
Le centre d'aide La traverse

Soulager la pauvreté en fournissant des éléments essentiles à la vie y compris la nourriture des vêtements des meubles ainsi que de l'aide au logement aux individus en situations de pauvreté dans la ville de saint-eustache et ses environs…

—
9
La Corbeille - Bordeaux - Cartierville

Supporter les démunis du quartier par l’aide alimentaire et professionnelle des personnes défavorisées qui ont des difficultés et de favoriser la réinsertion sociale et professionnelle des personnes défavorisées qui ont des difficultés…

—
10
Service D'entraide Bernieres St-Nicolas Inc.

Services offerts aux résidents du secteur bernières-st-nicolas (ville de lévis) 1) entraide sociale tel que transport accompagnement des ainés (assistance) 2) aide alimentaire 3) comptoir de vente de vêtements et autres articles à faible…

—
11
Au Bercail De St-Georges

Hébergement : accueillir les sans abris en leur offrant le gite la nourriture ainsi que le service de buanderie. réinsertion sociale : réinsertion social en lien avec la problématique vécues des personnes les intervenants supportant les…

—
12
Entraide Mercier

Service de dépannage d'urgence pour gens défavorisés favoriser des services d'entraide de partage et d'échange banque vestimentaire et autres articles pour la maison protection de l'environnement centre de réemploi frigo communautaire à…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Société St-Vincent de Paul de Québec and the most unlike its peers is Le Programme De Portage Relatif a La Dependance De La Drogue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLE GRENIER — C$8,755 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE JEUNESSE — C$5,918 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLE TREMPLIN — C$4,355 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJONCTION POUR ELLE — C$2,944 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetESPACE MELILOT — C$1,908 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSERVICE D'ENTRAIDE ST-ROMAULT — C$1,887 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRE DE PÉDIATRIE — C$1,799 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONFÉRENCE NOTRE-DAME — C$1,524 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetMAISON DE LA FAMILLE RIVE-SUD — C$1,406 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCRD- CA PROGRAMME DÉPENDANCE — C$567 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ SAINT-VINCENT-DE-PAUL DE QUEBEC — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSERVICE D'ENTRAIDE DE BREAKEYVILLE — C$470 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONFÉRENCE ST- DAVID — C$422 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSERVICE D'ENTRAIDE DE ST-JEAN-CHRYSOSTOME — C$352 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE JEUNESSE — C$313 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLE SERVICE D'ENTRAIDE CHARNY — C$310 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONFÉRENCE CHRIST-ROI (LA SOCIÉTÉ DE SAINT-VINCENT DE PAUL) — C$220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNEXION EMPLOI — C$170 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRESSOURCES NAISSANCES — C$130 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON SOUS LES ARBRES — C$17 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Québec Cha…Fondation Québec Phil…Valero Energy Foundat…L'Archevêque catholiq…Fondation Maurice Tan…Soeurs de la Charite …Fondation Saison Nouv…Food Banks Canada/Ban…Centraide Du Grand Mo…TELUS Friendly Future…United Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…
Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurentQC16× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Valero Energy Foundation of Canada / Fondation énergie Valero du Canada · L'Archevêque catholique romain de Québec · Fondation Maurice Tanguay Inc. · Soeurs de la Charite de Saint-Louis Du Québec · Fondation Saison Nouvelle · Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · TELUS Friendly Future Foundation - Fondation TELUS Pour un Futur Meilleur · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 100891258:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Magasin Général de Lévis’ filings →