North York, ON · Private foundation
Mack Charity Foundation
To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the income therefrom from time to time and to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the income tax act (canada)
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION | C$6,446 |
| CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOV | C$5,000 |
| BNEI ZION | C$4,349 |
| KAV SHALOM | C$2,507 |
| BETH HAMEDRASH L'HORAAH | C$360 |
| CTM | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA2× · 2022–2023 · C$40k · revenue +27%
- KSKAV SHALOM2× · 2022–2023 · C$4k · revenue ×20
- CTCHARITÉ TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL / CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL2× · 2022–2023 · C$2k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- KHKUPAS HACHESED MEOROTHone grant, 2022 · C$18k
- BZB'NAI ZION CHARITY FUNDone grant, 2022 · C$16k · revenue -25%
- MVMENUCHA VESIMCHAgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.
Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundations of Torah Charitable Organization and the most unlike its peers is Sinai Child Care Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH ↗
- Who funds B'NAI ZION CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION CHASIDEI BOBOV ↗
- Who funds BNEI ZION ↗
- Who funds KAV SHALOM ↗
- Who funds CHARITÉ TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL / CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL ↗
- Who funds MENUCHA VESIMCHA ↗
- Who funds BETH HAMEDRASH L'HORAAH ↗
- Who funds KESSER TORAH ↗
- Who funds MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB) ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATIONS OF TORAH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds SINAI CHILD CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROEL ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES ↗
- Who funds TALMUDICAL ACADEMY OF TORONTO MISHKAN HATORAH CHARITABLE TRU ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEF ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF CHASIDEI BRESLOV ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds KEREN ONTARIO ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF NEVE YERUSHALAYIM ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF TZEDAKAH MEIR BAAL HANESS OF JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · The M & J Charitable Trust · The Gross Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.