North York, ON · Private foundation
M. Koplowitz Charity Fund
To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to pay or apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to 'qualified donees' under the income tax act (canada).
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE EASTERN CHARITY FOUNDATION | C$204,042 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BFB.L FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · C$11M · revenue -49% · 48% of their budget
- TETHE EASTERN CHARITY FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · C$851k · revenue +124% · 77% of their budget
- EECHO2× · 2022–2023 · C$12k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- YFY.G FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$3.0M · 100% of their budget
- SKS. KORNGUT CHARITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · C$1.2M · revenue -98% · 100% of their budget
- KDKOLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$152k · revenue +68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.
Support of jewish education and institutions
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
To support with and participate with the scholarships provided by yeshivat kehilat yackov in brooklyn new york
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
To engage in charitable activities as follows: the furtherance of education and to provide gifts to other charitable organizations and the advancement of religion.
The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.
Issued scholarships for religious education
To advance education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to students at mosdos belz school in israel. to relieve poverty by providing financial assistance and interest-free loans to the poor. and to undertake activities…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation B'nai Levy / B'nai Levy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bnos Bais Yaakov High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds B.L FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Y.G FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds S. KORNGUT CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE EASTERN CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ECHO ↗
- Who funds KAV SHOLOM ↗
- Who funds K.H MEOROTH ↗
- Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV ↗
- Who funds YASHIVA KESSER TORAH ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAH YESODAI HATORAH ↗