Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Lethbridge, AB · Charitable organization

Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd

We provide: weekly and festive church services including live-streaming on our you tube channel conduct weddings funerals baptisms; offer confirmation classes and services adult bible studies education programs for children (sunday school) youth and adults; offer children and youth programs and services / women's and men's programs…

C$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$21k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$4k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$21k
C$1,220
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alberta and the Territories Synod ELCICC$21,070
Ecumenical Campus MinistryC$2,380
Inter-Faith Food BankC$1,220
Individual grant recipientC$720
Individual grant recipientC$50
Streets AliveC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$179k · 6 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$179k
C$405

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+47%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$770 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    Alberta and the Territories Synod ELCIC
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$42k · revenue +41%
  • EC
    Ecumenical Campus Ministry
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$12k · revenue +14%
  • ID
    INTER-FAITH DEVELOPEMENT FOOD BANK
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$7k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • WI
    WOMEN'S INTER-CHURCH COUNCIL OF CANADAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$315 · revenue +68%
  • LA
    Lutheran Association of Missionary Pilotsgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$50 · revenue +28%
  • LF
    LETHBRIDGE FOOD BANK SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$40 · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAlberta and the Territories Synod ELCIC — C$41,870 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEcumenical Campus Ministry — C$12,360 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetINTER-FAITH DEVELOPEMENT FOOD BANK — C$6,615 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S INTER-CHURCH COUNCIL OF CANADA — C$315 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStreets Alive — C$100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLutheran Association of Missionary Pilots — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETHBRIDGE FOOD BANK SOCIETY — C$40 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of Greater TorontoON4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 107649824:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd’s filings →