Saskatoon, SK · Private foundation
Louise & Fred Barker Foundation Inc.
Donations made to various community service groups to provide equipment & development to enhance the lives of the people in the affected communities.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$3k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$46k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| QUILL PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION | C$24,800 |
| TOWN OF WATSON | C$21,000 |
| RM OF SPALDING | C$1,500 |
| VILLAGE OF SPALDING | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- QPQUILL PLAINS HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · C$174k · revenue ×14 · 50% of their budget
- TOTOWN OF WATSON6× · 2017–2024 · C$99k
- VOVillage of Spalding6× · 2017–2024 · C$15k
Funded once
- TOTown of Watsonone grant, 2018 · C$21k
- VOVillage of Spaldingone grant, 2018 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.