Kamloops, BC · Charitable organization
Lord of Life Lutheran Church Kamloops B. C.
Church congregation worship services duirng advent + lent = two services per week bible studies pastoral care home visits catechism classes donations to missions and charities
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA | C$4,700 |
| LUTHERAN MISSIONARY WOMENS LEAGUE | C$580 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LCLUTHERAN CHURCH CANADA4× · 2021–2024 · C$18k · revenue +8%
- LMLUTHERAN MISSIONARY WOMENS LEAGUE4× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +64%
- KFKAMLOOPS FOOD BANK2× · 2022–2023 · C$2k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- MSMUSTARD SEEDone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +10%
- YWY WOMEN'S SHELTERone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +19%
- HLHope Lutheran Churchone grant, 2017 · C$400
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.