Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

London, ON · Public foundation

London North Rotary Club Foundation

During the year th foundation gave bursaries to first year students attending u.w.o.

C$94k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$54k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$40k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$54k
C$30,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEVENSON CHILDREN'S CAMP FOUNDATIONC$54,300
LONDON FOOD BANKC$30,000
RESIDENZA AFFORDABLE HOUSINGC$10,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$35k · 3 repeat orgsC$97k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

C$35k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$94k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$26k · revenue +109%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$7k · revenue -6%
  • WU
    Western University
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$3k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • WU
    WESTERN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue +30%
  • FC
    FANSHAWE COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue +73%
  • ET
    EDUCATE THE CHILDREN
    one grant, 2020 · C$500 · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
2
The Fidani Family Foundation

We donate to qualified donees in the health care field with a focus on hospitals specialized centres and universities.

—
3
Ashesi University Foundation Canada

The foundation continues to provide scholarships to post-secondary students in africa provides grants to ashesi university to carry out activities related to health collaborative and education collaborative. the health collabortive with…

—
4
London Health Sciences Foundation

Fundraising programs provide funding for the enhancement of patient care research education and capital projects for London Health Sciences Centre.

—
5
Capliano University Foundation

Endowment and other donations were raised; -income from endowments together with other donations were distributed to students and program areas at capilano university; -other gifts in kind were also solicited and transferred.

—
6
Kemptville College Foundation

Scholarships and the promotion of agricultural focussed post secondary education

—
7
Fleming College Foundation

The foundation raises funds for charitable purposes of an educational nature and in particular to provide scholarships fellowships bursaries prizes and financial assistance to students of sir sandford fleming college. as well the…

—
8
The Sandford Fleming Foundation

Comprehensive program of grants and awards for undergraduate students.

—
9
Florence E Taylor Charitable Foundation

Provided scholarships for post secondary education.

—
10
Fulham Memorial Scholarship Fund

Awards scholarships to assist with further education

—
11
Stem Camp Foundation

advancement of education

—
12
Mount Royal University Foundation

The mount royal university foundation received donations that support programs and scholarships administered and delivered at mount royal university

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fanshawe College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The University of Western Ontario. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEVENSON CHILDREN'S CAMP FOUNDATION — C$54,300 over 1y, 27% of budgetLONDON FOOD BANK — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRESIDENZA AFFORDABLE HOUSING — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWestern University — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFANSHAWE COLLEGE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATE THE CHILDREN — C$500 over 1y, 3.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

London Community Foun…United Way of Greater…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
London Community FoundationON8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: London Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 139697353:2023-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on London North Rotary Club’s filings →