Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Londesborough, ON · Charitable organization

Londesboro United Church

same as 2023

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$383
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$378k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mission & Service of the United Church of CanadaC$4,342
Huron HospiceC$383
Alzheimer SocietyC$288
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$67k · 7 repeat orgsC$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

C$67k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+36%

Still filing today

71%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$671 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Mission and Service Fund The United Church of Canada
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$51k · revenue +22%
  • CM
    Camp Menesetung
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$780 · revenue +99%
  • SC
    Seaforth Community Hospital Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$300 · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • LC
    London Conference of United Church of Canadagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +36%
  • WV
    World Vision Canada
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +6%
  • SC
    Sleeping Children the World
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue -37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Volunteers for Humanity

Promote health by providing affected populations with health care services or products that prevent and manage serious threats to health and survival. Relieving poverty in developing nations by providing basic necessities of life including…

—
2
South Huron Hospital Foundation

Raise funds for improvement of health care services in the area served by south huron hospital

—
3
Western Ontario Waterways Regional Council - the United Church of Canada

The purpose of the regional council is to be responsible for providing leadership and resources to the pastoral charges within its boundary in order that the life and work of jesus christ may be known in the united church of canada (the…

—
4
Bluewater Health Foundation

Bluewater Health Foundation raises funds for the hospital group known as Bluewater Health. These funds are spent on capital projects and to facilitate the acquisition of leading edge equipment and technology and the provision of programs…

—
5
Erie Shores Health Foundation

Erie shores health foundation raises capital for new equipment and building infrastructure for erie shores healthcare; capital campaigns currently being supported include diagnostic imaging mri equipment and urology. erie shores health…

—
6
Temiskaming Hospital Foundation

The role of the temiskaming hospital foundation is to raise money to support capital projects and to purchase equipment for the temiskaming hospital. health funding from the government excludes the purchase of equipment and only pays a…

—
7
Wdmh Foundation

To receive and maintain funds in order to make donations in part or in full to winchester district memorial hospital and rural healthcare innovations.

—
8
United Way of Perth-Huron

Raised funds for local registered charities and other not-for-profit organizations. re-invested in community projects.

—
9
Brant Community Healthcare System Foundation

Fund raised are for designated and capital projects and patient equipment for the brant community healthcare system brantford general hospital and the willett hospital sites

—
10
Amref Health Africa in Canada

Amref health africa in canada ensures access to good health for the most vulnerable and marginalized people in africa. with their active involvement we develop and implement innovative and sustainable solutions to critical health…

—
11
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
12
Yukon Hospital Foundation

Purchase new medical equipment for yukon hospital corporation as needs arise. provide on-time financial assistance to yukon cancer patients through a specific fund

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Antler River Watershed Regional Council - the United Church of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Camp Menesetung. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMission and Service Fund The United Church of Canada — C$51,128 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAuburn Pastoral Charge — C$14,094 over 3y, 30% of budgetLondon Conference of United Church of Canada — C$3,381 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Vision Canada — C$1,305 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSleeping Children the World — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWater First — C$1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Gathering Windsor Incorporated — C$1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Menesetung — C$780 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHuron Hospice — C$383 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeaforth Community Hospital Foundation — C$300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWingham and District Hospital Foundation — C$300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlexandra Marine and General Hospital Foundation — C$300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer Society — C$288 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Food Grains Bank — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Brucefield Community …The Walter J Blackbur…The Royal Canadian Le…My Tribute Gift Found…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Brucefield Community United ChurchON8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Brucefield Community United Church · The Walter J Blackburn Foundation · The Royal Canadian Legion Ontario Provincial Command Branches and Ladies' Auxiliaries Charitable Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 107641540:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Londesboro United Church’s filings →