Skip to content

Okla, SK · Charitable organization

Living Waters Christian Fellowship

We try to spread the gospel of jesus christ throughout thecommunity & surrounding communities through church services bible study summer camps bible students pastor incharge both by physical & monetary means.

C$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k12 grants · C$20k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
C$2,000
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$171k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMYC$20,000
POWER TO CHANGEC$3,000
TEEN CHALLENGEC$3,000
KETCHEN LAKE BIBLE CAMPC$2,400
APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF THE PENTECOST OF CANADAC$2,118
SAMARITANS PURSEC$2,000
ROCK SOLIDC$2,000
INSPIRATION MINISTRIESC$1,050
JEWISH VOICEC$1,000
WORLD VISION OF CANADAC$750
STARSC$750
KELVINGTON FOOD BANKC$750
Individual grant recipientC$750
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$133k · 13 repeat orgsC$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

C$133k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KL
    KETCHEN LAKE BIBLE CAMP
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$39k · revenue +99%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$26k · revenue ×60
  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2023 · C$4k
  • UD
    Upside Down Productionsgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +82%
  • RS
    ROCK SOLID
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
AngelOne Canada

Conducts missionary work in the developing countries

—
2
Kaleo Canada Inc.

Christian Missions funding to advance the Christian Gospel

—
3
Bic Canada - Global

Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…

—
4
T.D. Jakes Ministries - Canada

Preparing and broadcasting christian television programming in canada

—
5
International Christian Ministries

International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…

—
6
Equip Leadership Canada

A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide

—
7
Training Leaders International Canada

To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.

—
8
Teen Missions in Canada Inc.

Establishment of missionary projects involving canadian teenagers throughout the world.

—
9
Theological College of the Canadian Reformed Churches

Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel

—
10
World Harvest Outreach Ministries

Tent-campaigns in western canada plus indoor evangelistic outreaches in alberta bc saskatchewan and ontario plus outdoor gospel campaigns in the philippines sudan uganda and kenya and ministry in indonesia malaysia and malta

—
11
Canadian Baptist Ministries

Cbm is a global mission organization committed to sharing god's love through word and deed. we believe that god brings healing to a broken world through local churches. with over 150 years of experience we have seen that words and deeds…

—
12
Christ's Hope International- Canada

Providing health education by instruction to the public regarding hiv/aids; providing basic necessities of life such as shelter and medical assistance to children orphaned by hiv/aids; teaching the christian faith. all of 1-3 take place in…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jm Ministries Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Ketchen Lake Bible Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKETCHEN LAKE BIBLE CAMP — C$39,050 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$25,500 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE — C$13,605 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetACOP of Canada — C$12,283 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKETCHEN LAKE BIBLE CAMP — C$10,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROCK SOLID — C$9,015 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARATAINS PURSE — C$8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRATION MINISTRIES — C$5,100 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSPRINGSIDE BIBLE CAMP — C$4,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetWORLD VISION OF CANADA — C$2,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH VOICE — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — C$1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING THE HUNGRY — C$1,200 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetUpside Down Productions — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHand of Hope — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKELVINGTON FOOD BANK — C$750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHURCH OF THE ROCK — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL TEMPLE — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOYCE MEYERS MINISTRIES CANADA — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Hope Ranch — C$250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEthnos Canada — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNipawin Bible College — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KETCHEN LAKE BIBLE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds ACOP of Canada ↗
  • Who funds KETCHEN LAKE BIBLE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds ROCK SOLID ↗
  • Who funds SAMARATAINS PURSE ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRATION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGSIDE BIBLE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH VOICE ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING THE HUNGRY ↗
  • Who funds Upside Down Productions ↗
  • Who funds Hand of Hope ↗
  • Who funds KELVINGTON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH OF THE ROCK ↗
  • Who funds BETHEL TEMPLE ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE MEYERS MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
  • Who funds Living Hope Ranch ↗
  • Who funds Ethnos Canada ↗
  • Who funds Nipawin Bible College ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC2.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 137692869:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Living Waters Christian Fellowship’s filings →