Orilla, ON · Charitable organization
Living for Jesus Outreach Ministries
The Ministry operates without a physical location.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Eagle Worldwide Ministries | C$1,200 |
| Orillia Alliance Church | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$500 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TCTrust Communications Ministries3× · 2017–2019 · C$7k · revenue +7%
- DTDaystar Television Network2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +74%
- OSORILLIA SOLDIERS' MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2022 · C$2k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- HCHope Community Christian Churchgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$2k · revenue +72%
- KPKairos Prison Ministriesone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -44%
- OYOrillia Youth Centreone grant, 2022 · C$500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Church activities missions womens ministry mens ministry outreach small groups sunday school
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Personal evangelism to the greek community; spreading the word of god to the greek community through a tv & video ministry and production; provision of christian dvd's to churches in australia; spreading the word of god in greece through a…
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
Christian radio broadcasts
Preparing and broadcasting christian television programming in canada
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ through media
To advance religion by preacing the teachings and religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with christian faith.
Television and internet christian teaching ministry reaching canada and around the world with the christian massage of hope found in the bible to encourage and uplift people.
Make the religious teachings of dr andrew farley available to canadians through daily radio broadcasts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orillia Alliance Church of the Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada and the most unlike its peers is Greenhaven Shelter for Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAGLE WORLDWIDE MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds Trust Communications Ministries ↗
- Who funds Daystar Television Network ↗
- Who funds Hope Community Christian Church ↗
- Who funds ORILLIA SOLDIERS' MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH VOICE ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ORILLIA CORPS ↗
- Who funds Kairos Prison Ministries ↗
- Who funds ORILLIA PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds Orillia Alliance Church ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Westmount United Church · United Way Simcoe Muskoka · Living Hope Christian Reformed Church Orillia · Cornerstone Baptist Church Orillia · St Athanasius' Church · Canadian National Christian Foundation · Community Foundations of Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.