Skip to content

Markham, ON · Charitable organization

Liver Canada Foie Canada

Research midical research grant providing designated project funding with research partners in liver cancer organ donation and transplantation autoimmune liver disease viral hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease prevention.

C$750k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
Regions reached
C$116k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k16 grants · C$86k
  • C$10k–50k10 grants · C$191k
  • C$50k–250k6 grants · C$474k
C$10,609
Median grant
5
Regions reached
C$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHERATON CENTRE TORONTOC$115,920
SHERATON CENTRE TORONTOC$82,800
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF THE LIVERC$75,827
Individual grant recipientC$75,000
STAGEVISIONC$73,966
UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWANC$50,000
CANADIAN LIVER FOUNDATIONC$33,019
Individual grant recipientC$28,067
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF THE LIVERC$25,729
CORUS SALES INC.C$22,910
THE CARLU CORPORATIONC$17,500
BC CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL PHSAC$15,225
SAN PATTEN AND ASSOCIATESC$13,611
INDO-CANADIAN VOICE GROUPC$13,413
THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTAC$10,874
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 61% of grant dollars (C$2.8M). The 39% that went abroad (C$1.8M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 39% of all-years giving (C$1.8M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
DEC$6k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.5M · 10 repeat orgsC$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

C$2.5M
C$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+12%

Still filing today

40%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$596k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$826k · revenue +3%
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$510k · revenue +12%
  • C
    CAPAHC
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$29k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CH
    CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL
    one grant, 2023 · C$539k · revenue -30%
  • OH
    OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · C$300k · revenue +12%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · C$300k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
2
The Ottawa Hospital/L'hopital D'ottawa

The ottawa hospital is a three-campus hospital model with two full service campuses (civic and general). the objective of the hospital is to provide quality patient care through education and research and is dedicated to improving the…

—
3
Sunnybrook Research Institute

Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI) is the research arm of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC) a teaching hospital fully affiliated with the University of Toronto. The vision of SRI is to invent the future of health care. Our main…

—
4
University of Victoria

The University of Victoria is a comprehensive research university offering a wide range of undergraduate graduate and continuing studies programs.

—
5
Centre universitaire de santé McGill / McGill University Health Centre

Soins généraux et spécialisée médicaux de courte durée et services de soins de longue durée

—
6
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
7
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
8
Canadian Academy of Health Sciences/AcadÉMie Canadienne Des Sciences De La SantÉ.

The objective of the canadian academy of health sciences-academie canadienne des sciences de la sante is to provide assessments of and advice on key issues relevant to the health of canadians.

—
9
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority

1) medical surgical and psychiatric healthcare. 2) medical research

—
10
University of Ottawa Heart Institute/L'institut De Cardiologie De L'universite D'ottawa

A) coordinate comprehensive cardiac care services and resources within the institute facilities b) coordinate and deliver the cardiac care services at the hospital c) collaborate with other healthcare providers including hospitals within…

—
11
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Fourniture de soins et services médicaux permettant l'amélioration du bien-être et de la santé des patients (centre hospitalier centre d'hébergement longue durée centre local de services communautaires centre jeunesse centre de…

—
12
The University of Lethbridge

The University of Lethbridge educates at a post-secondary level in both Lethbridge and Calgary at undergraduate and graduate levels. The University conducts research in the Faculty of Arts and Science Business Fine Arts Education Health…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ottawa Hospital Research Institute/ Institut De Recherche De L'hopital D'ottawa and the most unlike its peers is Fatty Liver Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$825,570 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE HOSPITALIER DE UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL — C$539,105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK — C$509,772 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE — C$300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUTE — C$300,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCANADIAN LIVER FOUNDATION — C$144,715 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FATTY ALLIANCE — C$39,314 over 1y, 51% of budgetUNIVERSITE DE SHERBROOKE — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAPAHC — C$29,113 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetTHE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY — C$27,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBC CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL PHSA — C$15,225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBC HEPATITIS NETWORK — C$5,774 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH CARE — C$1,706 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN LIVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN ↗
  • Who funds THE FATTY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITE DE SHERBROOKE ↗
  • Who funds CAPAHC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY ↗
  • Who funds BC CENTRE FOR DISEASE CONTROL PHSA ↗
  • Who funds BC HEPATITIS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE SAINTE-JUSTINE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada/Societe de Leucemie & Lymphome Du CanadaON10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada/Societe de Leucemie & Lymphome Du Canada · Société de Recherche Sur le Cancer/Cancer Research Society · Cystic Fibrosis Canada/Fibrose Kystique Canada · Canadian Cancer Society - Société Canadienne Du Cancer · Fondation Brain Canada / Brain Canada Foundation · Fighting Blindness Canada · Muscular Dystrophy Canada / Dystrophie musculaire Canada · Breakthrough T1D Canada/Percée DT1 Canada · The Kidney Foundation of Canada / la Fondation Canadienne Du Rein · Diabetes Canada Diabète Canada · Weston Family Foundation / Fondation de la famille Weston · Charities Aid Foundation Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 106862949:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Liver Canada Foie Canada’s filings →