Toronto, ON · Charitable organization
Light to the World Christian Church
Promoting christian ideas to the general public.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Inka Link Canada | C$9,125 |
| Embrace a street child | C$5,000 |
| The Carr Street Gospel Church | C$4,000 |
| Abundance Canada | C$1,000 |
| The Power of the Cross Church | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$15k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SGSLAVIC GOSPEL ASSOCIATION CANADA5× · 2018–2022 · C$85k · revenue +60%
- EAEmbrace a street child3× · 2020–2024 · C$13k · revenue +107%
- TUTHE UNION OF SLAVIC CHURCHES OF EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND S3× · 2019–2023 · C$3k · revenue -8%
Funded once
- SESLAVIC EVANGELICAL BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2022 · C$350 · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity does its work among slavic people. we provide christian literature place of worship and pastoral service. we help people who are in need. we support orphanse. we provide on-line service.
Worship meetings sunday school for children bible school for adults evangelism
Proclaim the gosepl of jesus christ through ministerial work sunday school worship services.
Conducts worship services and activities sunday school bible study and prayer services. ministry to the sick and shut-ins. missionary work.
Church services and distribution of donations for radio missions and the needy.
Planning
Regular church service sunday school and mid-week bible study and prayer meeting
Worship services various ministries for kids and youth aduslts and seniors pastoral care camps provide benevolent aid to people in need
Evangelical & missionary organization for Russian - speaking community in GTA. Religious publications street evangelism bible studies helping poor orphans & homeless printing brochures prison ministry providing support for missionaries…
The Slavic Evangelical Church is a religious congregation existing for the purpose of Christian worship education Spiritual and practical support for its members and attendees particularly of Slavic origin. To achieve these goals the…
We hold worship services weekly; we also have weekly bible study for youth and adults
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Carr Street Gospel Church and the most unlike its peers is Abundance Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SLAVIC GOSPEL ASSOCIATION CANADA ↗
- Who funds Embrace a street child ↗
- Who funds Inka Link Canada ↗
- Who funds The Carr Street Gospel Church ↗
- Who funds THE UNION OF SLAVIC CHURCHES OF EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANS AND S ↗
- Who funds Abundance Canada ↗
- Who funds The Power of the Cross Church ↗
- Who funds SLAVIC EVANGELICAL BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.