Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization
Light and Salt Mission Society
To advance religion by teaching the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with christian faith.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HANA MISSION SOCIETY | C$1,000 |
| S0-MANG MISSION COMMUNITY | C$1,000 |
| HINDOL MISSION CHURCH | C$1,000 |
| SEED INTERNATIONAL MISSION OF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| SURREY HOUSE OF GRACE | C$1,000 |
| VANCOUVER KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | C$1,000 |
| SAMON MINISTRY | C$1,000 |
| WHEAT MISSION SOCIETY IN VANCOUVER | C$1,000 |
| NEW LIVINGSTONES FELLOWSHIP | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NLNEW LIVINGSTONES FELLOWSHIP3× · 2019–2021 · C$3k · revenue +30%
- SMSAMON MINISTRY3× · 2019–2021 · C$3k · revenue +100%
- VKVANCOUVER KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH3× · 2019–2021 · C$3k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- SCSURREY CANAAN CHURCHone grant, 2018 · C$300 · revenue -30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We hold weekly Christian worship services hold bible studies to members and involve in local Christian missionary works.
Sunday service bible study volunteering at siloam mission
Sunday worship and fellowship Sunday school Bible Study
Regular christian worhip on sunday bible studies for youth and adults support for missions and other projects summer missionary program
Christian missionary work provide bible study sessions to members provide bible reading program
Sunday christian worship services children's sunday school program prayer meetings gospel music service -bible study charitable and missionary activities
Providing worship services on sundays short-term mission trip to guatemala serving foods to homeless people
Regular christian worship for korean community -bible study -fellowship meetings -prayer meetings -education and sunday schools -provide foods for homeless people -support missionaries
Worships sunday school and mission.
Sailen adventist church in mizoram india
Church services - prayer meetings - bible studies
Church: - english service mandarin service cantonese service english bible study mandarin bible study cantonese bible study sunday school
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Somang Mission Community and the most unlike its peers is Samon Ministry Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHEAT MISSION SOCIETY IN VANCOUVER ↗
- Who funds NEW LIVINGSTONES FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds HINDOL MISSION CHURCH ↗
- Who funds SEED INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds SURREY HOUSE OF GRACE ↗
- Who funds SAMON MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds VANCOUVER KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds SO-MANG MISSION COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds HANA MISSION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SURREY CANAAN CHURCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coram Deo Foundation · The Philadelphia Church of Vancouver Society · Kwanglim Methodist Church in Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.