Skip to content

Stratford, ON · Charitable organization

Life Church

We conduct worship services.

C$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,300
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$384k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO YOUTH FOR CHRISTC$6,400
DYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONALC$2,500
SERVING IN MISSIONC$1,300
STRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSINGC$1,167
COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CANADAC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$172k · 10 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

C$172k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+85%

Still filing today

90%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$61k · revenue +57%
  • SI
    SERVING IN MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue +30%
  • SH
    STRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSING
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • SO
    Southwestern Ontario Youth For Christ
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k
  • RM
    Reddekopp Ministriesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +85%
  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2017 · C$450

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bic Canada - Global

Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…

—
2
Multiply Network

The organization operates global Christian mission programs by training and sending missionaries and church planting teams to all parts of the world. MULTIPLY Network builds the capacity of national leaders to contribute in the same ways.…

—
3
Going Beyond Missions

Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings

—
4
International Christian Ministries

International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…

—
5
Great Commission Collective Canada

Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches

—
6
Seedcare International Ministries

We support the ministries of under-resourced missionaries in rural villages and the indigenous missions in the Philippines and in other countries. We distribute Bibles and Christian literature. We host feeding programs for children. We…

—
7
Global Christian Ministries

Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done

—
8
Global Disciples Canada

We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…

—
9
Victory Churches International Inc.

Planting of new churches world missions leadership development

—
10
Partnership Ministries

Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.

—
11
Institute for Church Partnership Evangelism

Short term mission teams traveled from canada to assist national churches in evangelism discipleship and church planting.

—
12
Partners in Harvest (Canada)

We encourage serve train and counsel pih member congregations pastors ministry leaders. we serve the broad body of christ with worldwide conferences. we link together local and regional national and international leaders to share resources…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is Stratford House of Blessing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL — C$60,705 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetSERVING IN MISSION — C$21,305 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSING — C$13,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CANADA — C$12,652 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTEARFUND CANADA — C$4,840 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAssociated Gospel Churches — C$4,801 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS INTERNATIONAL-CHRISTIAN NATIONALS EVANGELICAL MISSI — C$3,730 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGideons Global Church Partnership — C$3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPioneers International — C$2,631 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetReddekopp Ministries — C$1,001 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SERVING IN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSING ↗
  • Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CANADA ↗
  • Who funds TEARFUND CANADA ↗
  • Who funds Associated Gospel Churches ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL-CHRISTIAN NATIONALS EVANGELICAL MISSI ↗
  • Who funds Gideons Global Church Partnership ↗
  • Who funds Pioneers International ↗
  • Who funds Reddekopp Ministries ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps CanadonON2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118911460:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Life Church’s filings →