Stratford, ON · Charitable organization
Life Church
We conduct worship services.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO YOUTH FOR CHRIST | C$6,400 |
| DYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL | C$2,500 |
| SERVING IN MISSION | C$1,300 |
| STRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSING | C$1,167 |
| COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CANADA | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- DCDYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL8× · 2017–2024 · C$61k · revenue +57%
- SISERVING IN MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue +30%
- SHSTRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSING8× · 2017–2024 · C$14k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- SOSouthwestern Ontario Youth For Christone grant, 2017 · C$5k
- RMReddekopp Ministriesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +85%
- SASalvation Armyone grant, 2017 · C$450
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
The organization operates global Christian mission programs by training and sending missionaries and church planting teams to all parts of the world. MULTIPLY Network builds the capacity of national leaders to contribute in the same ways.…
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
We support the ministries of under-resourced missionaries in rural villages and the indigenous missions in the Philippines and in other countries. We distribute Bibles and Christian literature. We host feeding programs for children. We…
Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
Planting of new churches world missions leadership development
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Short term mission teams traveled from canada to assist national churches in evangelism discipleship and church planting.
We encourage serve train and counsel pih member congregations pastors ministry leaders. we serve the broad body of christ with worldwide conferences. we link together local and regional national and international leaders to share resources…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is Stratford House of Blessing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DYNAMIC CHURCHES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SERVING IN MISSION ↗
- Who funds STRATFORD HOUSE OF BLESSING ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION CANADA ↗
- Who funds TEARFUND CANADA ↗
- Who funds Associated Gospel Churches ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL-CHRISTIAN NATIONALS EVANGELICAL MISSI ↗
- Who funds Gideons Global Church Partnership ↗
- Who funds Pioneers International ↗
- Who funds Reddekopp Ministries ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.