Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Private foundation

Li Ka Shing (Canada) Foundation

The sole and exclusive objectives of the foundation are to disburse such moneys of the foundation by way of gifts as the foundation shall see fit to 'qualified donees' within the meaning of that term under the income tax act (canada); and to undertake charitable activities through agents or otherwise both within and outside of canada.

C$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$9.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,981,916
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANC$8,983,800
THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONGC$3,981,916
THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONGC$3,641,404
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 7% of grant dollars (C$16M). The 93% that went abroad (C$202M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 93% of all-years giving (C$202M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$32M · 9 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$188M · 13 repeat orgsC$29M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +104860% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

C$188M
C$29M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+104860%
+37%

Still filing today

15%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TECHNION- ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$78M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$37M
  • UO
    University of Oxford
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$20M

Funded once

  • TI
    Technician - Isreal Institute of Technology
    one grant, 2018 · C$16M
  • TL
    The Leland Sanford Junior University (Stanford University)
    one grant, 2017 · C$4.0M
  • TU
    THE UNIVERISTY OF HONG KONG
    one grant, 2019 · C$2.1M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
2
University of Victoria

The University of Victoria is a comprehensive research university offering a wide range of undergraduate graduate and continuing studies programs.

—
3
Brock University

Teaching and Research in broadly based undergraduate and graduate education programs including professional and interdisciplinary programs. The University provides education programs across seven faculties: Applied Health Sciences Business…

—
4
Carleton University

Carleton University provides post-secondary education.

—
5
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
6
The Governors of the University of Calgary

The University of Calgary had 37 400 full time and part time students in the 2023/2024 fiscal year from over 100 countries registered in the following 15 faculties: Art Cummung School of Medicine Environmental Design Graduate Studies…

—
7
University of the Fraser Valley

The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…

—
8
The University of Lethbridge

The University of Lethbridge educates at a post-secondary level in both Lethbridge and Calgary at undergraduate and graduate levels. The University conducts research in the Faculty of Arts and Science Business Fine Arts Education Health…

—
9
University of Prince Edward Island

Post-Secondary Education

—
10
The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Instruction and research in a university.

—
11
Saint Mary's University

Saint Mary’s University is one of Canada’s top primarily undergraduate universities known for its international collaborations leadership in entrepreneurship and research that benefits local and global communities. We provide undergraduate…

—
12
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Ottawa / UniversitÉ D'ottawa and the most unlike its peers is Shurniak Gallery Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Aberta — C$7,500,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA — C$2,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA — C$2,000,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSt. Michael's Hospital — C$1,700,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMcGill University — C$1,314,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPALLIUM FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$500,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLIGHTS - Community Living Toronto — C$200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHURNIAK GALLERY INC — C$100,000 over 1y, 36% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Aberta ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA ↗
  • Who funds St. Michael's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds McGill University ↗
  • Who funds PALLIUM FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTS - Community Living Toronto ↗
  • Who funds SHURNIAK GALLERY INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 857269971:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Li Ka Shing (Canada)’s filings →