Saint-Jerome, QC · Charitable organization
Leveque Catholique Romain de Saint-Jerome-Mont-Laurier
Nous mettons en place et coordonnons des projets de pastorale avec les paroisses du diocèse.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k7 grants · C$22k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$89k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAROISSE NOTRE-DAME DE L'ALLIANCE | C$88,576 |
| CENTRE DE LA FAMILLE | C$5,000 |
| OFFICE DE CATÉCH. DU QUÉBEC | C$3,000 |
| LE CENTRE DE JOURS DE ST-JÉRÔME | C$3,000 |
| CONFERENCE ST-VINCENT DE PAUL DE MONT-LAURIER INC | C$3,000 |
| CENTRAIDE HAUTES LAURENTIDES | C$3,000 |
| CALVAIRE D'HUBERDEAU | C$2,500 |
| PAROISSE NOTRE-DAME | C$2,400 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$102k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LCLE CENTRE DE JOURS DE ST- JÉRÔME5× · 2020–2024 · C$66k · revenue +84%
- PSParoisse Ste-Anne-des-Plaines2× · 2018–2021 · C$44k · revenue +4%
- GMGARDE- MANGER DES PAYS D'EN HAUT4× · 2020–2023 · C$5k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CÉCORPORATION ÉPISCOPALE CATHOLIQUE ROMAINE MONT-LAURIERone grant, 2022 · C$50k
- LCLE CENTRE DE JOURS DE ST-JÉRÔMEone grant, 2019 · C$25k
- PSPAROISSE ST- ANASTASIEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$11k · revenue +55% · 62% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Église catholique
Culte de la religion catholique
Église catholique
Église catholique
Eglise catholique lieu de culte
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fabrique de la paroisse Notre-Dame-des-Pays-d'en-Haut and the most unlike its peers is La Fondation André Boudreau. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LE CENTRE DE JOURS DE ST- JÉRÔME ↗
- Who funds Paroisse Ste-Anne-des-Plaines ↗
- Who funds CONGRÉGATION MATER DEI ↗
- Who funds PAROISSE ST- ANASTASIE ↗
- Who funds OFFICE DE CATÉCHÈSE DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds PAROISSE SAINT- JÉRÔME (DÉPANNAGE ALIMENTAIRE STE- PAULE) ↗
- Who funds CONGRÉGATION DES FRÈRES SAINT-JEAN ↗
- Who funds GARDE- MANGER DES PAYS D'EN HAUT ↗
- Who funds CENTRE DE LA FAMILLE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION ANDRÉ BOUDREAU ↗
- Who funds PAROISSE NOTRE-DAME ↗
- Who funds MAISON DE SOPHIA ↗
- Who funds CENTRAIDE HAUTES LAURENTIDES ↗
- Who funds CONFERENCE ST-VINCENT DE PAUL DE MONT-LAURIER INC ↗
- Who funds PANIERS DE NOEL MONT-LAURIER ↗
- Who funds Paroisse Ste-Marie-Madeleine ↗
- Who funds CACRM ↗
- Who funds FABRIQUE DE PAROISSE SAINTE-FAMILLE ↗
- Who funds CALVAIRE D'HUBERDEAU ↗
- Who funds MISSION CHEZ NOUS ↗
- Who funds FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINT-EUSTACHE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centraide Laurentides · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.