Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Mount Forest, ON · Charitable organization

Letterbreen Pastoral Charge

We had regular church services when pulpit supply was available

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$286k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mission and ServiceC$2,855
Friends of the OrphansC$420
Mount Forest Food BankC$200
Cancer Patient ServicesC$200
Individual grant recipientC$100
Louise Marshall Hospital FoundationC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$28k · 8 repeat orgsC$200 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

C$28k
C$200

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Mission And Service and Hurricane Relife
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue +22%
  • CP
    CANCER PATIENT SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +122%
  • MF
    MOUNT FOREST FOOD BANK
    5× · 2019–2024 · C$1k · revenue +358%

Funded once

  • MF
    MOUNT FOREST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2018 · C$200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMission And Service and Hurricane Relife — C$21,074 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER PATIENT SERVICES — C$1,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT FOREST FOOD BANK — C$1,050 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetLOUISE MARSHALL HOSPITAL — C$700 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mission And Service and Hurricane Relife ↗
  • Who funds CANCER PATIENT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT FOREST FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds LOUISE MARSHALL HOSPITAL ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118959253:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Letterbreen Pastoral Charge’s filings →