Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Lethbridge, AB · Charitable organization

Lethbridge & District Pro-Life Association

Education and awareness of human development and the promotion of human rights for all education on life issues educational curriculum speakers training and promoting our message through advertising and social media.

C$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,000
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFE CANADAC$4,000
NURTURE PREGNANCY CENTREC$2,000
LETHBRIDGE PREGNANCY CARE CENTREC$1,500
ALIES AND THE BACK PORCHC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$68k · 7 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +175% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

C$68k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+175%
+45%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$14k · revenue +365%
  • MH
    Medicine Hat Pregnancy & Family Support Centre
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$11k · revenue +97%
  • LP
    LETHBRIDGE PRO-LIFE ASSOC - ELSIE'S HOUSE
    2× · 2019–2023 · C$8k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • GT
    GIVE THE WORLD (EQUIPPING CHRISTIAN WORKERS SOCIETY CANADA)
    one grant, 2021 · C$2k · revenue +3%
  • C
    CHOICE42
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • DI
    Deveber Institutegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +90%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Advokate Life & Education Services Society

Educational materials lending library newsletter pregnancy service centres speakers for schools and community groups free maternity and baby supplies for low income parents texting help line it provides accurate information tangible…

—
2
Lambton Right-to-Life

Education programs on the value of life programs for expectants and postpartum mothers in need

—
3
Canadian Physicians for Life/ Medecins Du Canada Pour Le Respect De La Vie

Education of the public and medical profession with respect to the protection of all stages of human life and research aimed at promoting protection of all stages of human life and research aimed at promoting protection of all stages of…

—
4
Right to Life Association

Pregnant distress services - to advise and assist clients who are distressed about pregnancy and provide layettes for the needy. Helpline - to assist individuals with post abortion syndrome Public education and other study groups.…

—
5
Cambridge Right to Life

1. to inform/ educate the general public of the facts related to human rights 2. to increase respect to all human rights from conception to natural death

—
6
Outreach for Life Association of Edmonton

We compassionately equip women to overcome challenges related to an unexpected pregnancy by providing essential resources and support. we offer a safe and caring space in which we prepare clients to advocate for themselves navigate…

—
7
Edmonton Prolife Society

Our primary work is educational in nature. we prepare displays and material for public information via conferences conventions and billoards. from our office we prepare materials and publications to provide facts on life. guest speakers…

—
8
Right to Life Association of Toronto and Area

Educational presentations conferences seminars and outreach on life issues including abortion euthanasia assisted suicide infanticide and fetal/embryonic experimentation based on scientific historical and philosophical sources; resources…

—
9
Canadian Childbirth Association

Childbirth education

—
10
Life Culture Canada Inc.

We educate people on life issues by distributing educational material hosting conferences and banquets. we offer peer support groups for those going through pregnancy and infant loss infertility and foster moms. we offer support for those…

—
11
Central Alberta Pregnancy Care Centre Society

To equip and empower individuals and their families seeking pregnancy-related resources by: 'delivering accurate information to those facing an unexpected pregnancy offering support and healing to those affected by a pregnancy…

—
12
Pro-Choice Society of Lethbridge & Southern Alberta

The Pro-Choice Society of Lethbridge & Southern Alberta supports individual rights to personal autonomy over personal decisions intimately affecting them specifically access to abortion and birth control. Our current programs include: (1)…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifecanada National Association and the most unlike its peers is The De Veber Institute for Bioethics and Social Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJustice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms — C$13,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMedicine Hat Pregnancy & Family Support Centre — C$11,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetLETHBRIDGE PRO-LIFE ASSOC - ELSIE'S HOUSE — C$8,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE COMMUNITY CARE — C$6,500 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetAlies & Teh Back Porch — C$6,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLIFE CANADA — C$5,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetGIVE THE WORLD (EQUIPPING CHRISTIAN WORKERS SOCIETY CANADA) — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDeveber Institute — C$500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCrisis Pregnancy Cente of Winnipeg — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC4.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 119018307:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Lethbridge & District Pro-Life Association’s filings →