Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Les productions porte parole
Production of documentary theatre
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$12k
- C$10k–50k7 grants · C$141k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE R. HOWARD WEBTER FOUNDATION | C$40,000 |
| THE ASPER FOUNDATION | C$25,000 |
| COLE FOUNDATION | C$21,250 |
| THE BIRKS FAMILY FOUNDATION | C$20,000 |
| FOUNDATION ERIC T.WEBSTER | C$15,000 |
| THE JOHN DOBSON FOUNDATION | C$10,000 |
| THE JARISLOWSKY FOUNDATION | C$10,000 |
| LARRY AND COOKIE ROSSY FAMILY FOUNDATION | C$5,000 |
| ZELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION | C$3,000 |
| FONDATION PIERRE DESMARAIS | C$2,000 |
| THE CHAWKERS FOUNDATION | C$1,500 |
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Making grants to organizations for scientists carrying on research in gene and cell thereapy.
The foundation distributes to qualified donees.
The foundation makes grants and donations to other qualified donees.
Th object of the foundation's main activities is to support the advancement of education fine arts and scientific research through gifts to other charitable organizations.
Make gifts to qualified donees
It awarded scholarships
Support of jewish education and institutions
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Birks Family Foundation / La fondation de la famille Birks and the most unlike its peers is The John Dobson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE R. HOWARD WEBTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE ASPER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BIRKS FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION ERIC T.WEBSTER ↗
- Who funds THE JOHN DOBSON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JARISLOWSKY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LARRY AND COOKIE ROSSY FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ZELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FONDATION PIERRE DESMARAIS ↗
- Who funds THE CHAWKERS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.