Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Quebec, QC · Charitable organization

Les partenaires communautaires Jeffrey Hale

The mission of jeffery hale community partners is to promote and contribute to the health and well-being of the english-speaking population of the capitale-nationale (greater quebec city region).

C$711
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$240
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$175
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRASER RECOVERY PROGRAMC$240
CITADEL FOUNDATIONC$236
MORIN CENTERC$175
CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETYC$30
ALZEIHMER SOCIETY OF CANADAC$30
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$4k · 6 repeat orgsC$750 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

C$4k
C$750

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+31%

Still filing today

83%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEFFERY HALE FRIENDS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$1k · revenue +25%
  • CF
    CITADEL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$736 · revenue +211%
  • FR
    FRASER RECOVERY PROGRAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$630 · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • FD
    Fondation des anciens du Québec High Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$300 · revenue +31%
  • C
    CROIX-ROUGE
    one grant, 2022 · C$250 · revenue -47%
  • LM
    LA MAISON DES JEUNES DE CAP-ROUGE INC.graduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue +65%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
3
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
4
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
5
Fondation Alzheimer de Québec

Supporter les activités de la société alzheimer de québec

—
6
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
7
La Fondation De L'hÔPital GÉNÉRal De MontrÉAl the MontrÉAl General Hospital Foundation

Distribute funds to the benefit of the montreal general hospital mcgill university health centre and affiliated entities of mcgill university academic health centre and other organizations of the quebec health network for equipment…

—
8
Fondation De L'institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute Foundation

La fondation de l'institut de cardiologie de ontréal recueille et administre des fonds pour soutenir la recherche la prévention et l'enseignement prodigués par l'institut de cardiologie de montréal. elle encourage ainsi l'excellence d'une…

—
9
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
10
Fondation de l'hôpital Jean-Talon

Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…

—
11
Fondation Quebecoise Du Patrimoine/Heritage Quebec Foundatio
—
12
Fondation du Cégep de Trois-Rivières
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Quebec City English-Speaking Community Foundation/ La Fondation de la communauté d'expression anglaise de Québec and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Centre Historique Joseph Morrin / Joseph Morrin Historical Centre Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEFFERY HALE FRIENDS FOUNDATION — C$1,163 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCITADEL FOUNDATION — C$736 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRASER RECOVERY PROGRAM — C$630 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFondation des anciens du Québec High School — C$300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCROIX-ROUGE — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY — C$150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZEIHMER SOCIETY OF CANADA — C$150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLA MAISON DES JEUNES DE CAP-ROUGE INC. — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps Canadon
Canadahelps CanadonON2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under core health care.

Source object 132537754:2024-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Les partenaires communautaires Jeffrey Hale’s filings →