Quebec, QC · Charitable organization
Les Messagères de Notre-Dame de L'Assomption
Soutien physique moral et spirituel aux femmes seules.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k8 grants · C$14k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION PATRIMOINE LIMOILOU | C$10,000 |
| L'ARCHEVÊQUE CATHOLIQUE ROMAIN DE QUÉBEC | C$6,000 |
| LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE SAINT-FRANCOIS DE LAVAL | C$5,550 |
| LA BOUCHÉE GÉNÉREUSE | C$500 |
| PATRO DE CHARLESBOURG | C$500 |
| LES OUEVRES JEAN-LAFRANCE INC. | C$500 |
| PATRO ROC-AMADOUR | C$500 |
| LES OEUVRES JEAN-LAFRANCE INC | C$500 |
| FONDATION RICHELIEU QUÉBEC -ANCIENNE-LORETTE | C$250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- LOLES OUEVRES JEAN-LAFRANCE INC.2× · 2018–2023 · C$1k · revenue +25%
- FCFONDATION CSSS VIEILLE-CAPITALE2× · 2017–2018 · C$500 · revenue -76%
- FRFONDATION RICHELIEU QUÉBEC -ANCIENNE-LORETTE3× · 2021–2023 · C$450 · revenue +13%
Funded once
- FPFONDATION PATRIMOINE LIMOILOUone grant, 2023 · C$10k · revenue -95%
- LCL'ARCHEVÊQUE CATHOLIQUE ROMAIN DE QUÉBECgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$6k · revenue +36%
- LFLA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE SAINT-FRANCOIS DE LAVALone grant, 2023 · C$6k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Acquérir posséder détenir et administrer des biens pour fins de l'exercice de la religion catholique romaine dans les paroisses pour laquelle elle est formée.
Administrer des biens de la fabrique sur un territoire érigé en paroisse pour des fins de religion catholique romaine au profit des fidèles de cette religion. assurer l'évangélisation le culte et les sacrements promouvoir la pratique de la…
Exercice de la religion catholique romaine
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation pour les Ainés et l'Innovation Sociale and the most unlike its peers is Les Oeuvres Jean Lafrance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FONDATION PATRIMOINE LIMOILOU ↗
- Who funds L'ARCHEVÊQUE CATHOLIQUE ROMAIN DE QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE SAINT-FRANCOIS DE LAVAL ↗
- Who funds LES OUEVRES JEAN-LAFRANCE INC. ↗
- Who funds PATRO DE CHARLESBOURG ↗
- Who funds PATRO ROC-AMADOUR ↗
- Who funds FONDATION CSSS VIEILLE-CAPITALE ↗
- Who funds FONDATION RICHELIEU QUÉBEC -ANCIENNE-LORETTE ↗
- Who funds CENTRE MISSIONNAIRE OBLAT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Les religieux de Saint-Vincent de Paul (Canada) · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.