Skip to content
Canadian charities

Saint-Felix-De-Valois, QC · Charitable organization

Les Chevaliers Colomb de St-Felix-De-Valois No 4220

Aide et service destinés au secteur de la bienfaisance

C$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$240
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$52k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE ST-MARTIN DE LA BAYONNEC$3,000
FONDATION QUÉBECOISE DU CANCERC$1,000
CENTRE SERVICE SCOLAIRE DES SAMARESC$446
CORPS DE CADETS ARRAS 2973C$400
JUMELAGE ST-FÉLIX DOUBANC$300
CENTRAIDE STE-MELANIEC$240
Individual grant recipientC$150
LES AMIS DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT ST - GABRIELC$150
CERCLE DES FERMIÈRES ST-GABRIELC$150
Individual grant recipientC$100
CERCLE DES FERMIÈRES DE MANDEVILLEC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$22k · 10 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

C$22k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+34%

Still filing today

90%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FQ
    FONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DU CANCER
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +91%
  • FS
    FABRIQUE ST-MARTIN DE LA BAYONNE
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$5k · revenue +0%
  • FD
    FONDATION DES SAMARES
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$5k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST-PIETTE-DE-BELLES-MONTAGNES
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue -8%
  • A#
    AFÉAS #LIBRO1436 FOLIO61
    one grant, 2023 · C$200
  • PQ
    PARKINSON QUÉBECgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$200 · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maison Des Jeunes L'authentique
—
2
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Sainte-Marguerite
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Blandine
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
7
La Maison Des Jeunes Au Coeur Des Montagnes

Maison des jeunes

—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
9
Fondation Le Bon Pilote
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-La-Salette
—
11
Maison Des Jeunes De Beauce-Sartigan
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Des Samares and the most unlike its peers is La Maison Des Jeunes De St-FÉLix-De-Valois. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFONDATION QUÉBÉCOISE DU CANCER — C$7,412 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFABRIQUE ST-MARTIN DE LA BAYONNE — C$4,825 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetFONDATION DES SAMARES — C$4,650 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetLACAC CORPS DE CADETS — C$3,033 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetASS PULMONAIRE DU QUÉBEC — C$550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST-PIETTE-DE-BELLES-MONTAGNES — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSCOUTS NORD-JOLI — C$375 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION MÉMOIRE DU COEUR — C$300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSCLÉROSE EN PLAQUE — C$300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMITÉ DES OEUVRES CHARITABLES DU CONSEILS ST-JEAN-DE-... — C$240 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetPARKINSON QUÉBEC — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPÉRATION ENFANT SOLEIL — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES DE ST-FÉLIX — C$150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION MARTIN MATTE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION DU CEGEP DE JOLIETTE — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLUB DES PETITS DEJEUNERS — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centraide Québec Cha…Centraide Du Grand Mo…Jewish Community Foun…United Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurentQC6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 888204849:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Les Chevaliers Colomb de St-Felix-De-Valois No 4220’s filings →