Maniwaki, QC · Charitable organization
Le Chemin - Maniwaki
Nous organisons des services de culte hebdomadaires nous offrons des soins pastoraux nous offrons des ministères pour les enfants les jeunes les hommes et les femmes sur une base hebdomadaire nous fournissons des conseils en matière de mariage et de conseils en crise personnelle nous témoignons l'évangile selon notre déclaration de foi
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ÉGLISE LE CHEMIN | C$8,126 |
| Église Plein Évangile Lasalle | C$2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$1,200 |
| Lion of Judah Ministries | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ÉLÉGLISE LE CHEMIN6× · 2018–2024 · C$22k · revenue +42%
- COCONFERENCE OF MENNONITE BRETHREN5× · 2017–2022 · C$4k · revenue -83%
- LOLion of Judah Ministries5× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue -47%
Funded once
- EDEVANGILE DE LA SALLEone grant, 2022 · C$2k
- ELEGLISE LE CHEMINone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -42%
- PSPeer Servants Canadaone grant, 2022 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Culte du dimanche matin étude biblique et prière les mercredis évangélisation travail pastoral des membres et des visiteurs
Lieu de culte organismes missionnaires évangélisation
Église chrétienne évangélique qui offre des cultes religieux principalement le dimanche de l'enseignement biblique et des oeuvres communautaires de bienfaisance.
Promouvoir l'evangelisation du christ par les moyens de la predication et diverses autres
Prédication et enseignement de la bible assemblées le dimanche et sur semaine visites dans les hôpitaux et foyer aide aux démunis de la société fraternisation auprès de la congrégation
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Organiser administrer et maintenir une église évangélique de jésus-christ à tous les hommes.
Nous tenons des services religieux toutes les semaines (culte) nous offrons un service de pastorale. evangéliser et édifier
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre National Chrétien L'Espoir des Générations-Christian National Center Hope of the Generations and the most unlike its peers is World Team. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.