Skip to content
Canadian charities

Alexandria, ON · Charitable organization

Le Centre Culturel-Les Trois P'Tits Points

Service de garderie spectacles et soirées francophones ateliers culturels

C$118k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$18k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$50k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA FONDATION DE L'HOSPITAL GLENGARRY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FO...C$50,000
CORNWALL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$40,000
CHILREN`S TREATMENT CENTREC$10,000
CANADIAN TIRE JUMPSTARTC$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CORNWALLC$5,000
LA SOCIÉTÉ ST-VINCENT DE PAULC$5,000
BIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF CORNWALL AND DISTRICT INC.C$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$70k · 5 repeat orgsC$90k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

C$70k
C$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+92%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$90k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHILREN`S TREATMENT CENTRE
    4× · 2019–2022 · C$29k · revenue +3%
  • LS
    LA SOCIÉTÉ ST-VINCENT DE PAUL
    4× · 2019–2022 · C$16k · revenue +93%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CORNWALL
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$10k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • LF
    LA FONDATION DE L'HOSPITAL GLENGARRY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FO...graduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$50k · revenue +92%
  • CC
    CORNWALL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$40k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLA FONDATION DE L'HOSPITAL GLENGARRY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FO... — C$50,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetCORNWALL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCHILREN`S TREATMENT CENTRE — C$28,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLA SOCIÉTÉ ST-VINCENT DE PAUL — C$16,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCANADIAN TIRE JUMPSTART — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CORNWALL — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS AND BIG SISTERS OF CORNWALL AND DISTRICT INC. — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Macewen FoundationMOOD DISORDERS SOCIET…Zion United ChurchThe Lafleche Family F…Catholic District Sch…Five B Family Foundat…United Way East Ontar…Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…My Tribute Gift Found…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…
Macewen FoundationON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Macewen Foundation · MOOD DISORDERS SOCIETY OF CANADA La Societe Pour Les Troubles de L'Humeur du Canada · Zion United Church · The Lafleche Family Foundation/ · Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario · Five B Family Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-03-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under arts.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2023) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 133854745:2022-03-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Le Centre Culturel-Les Trois P'Tits Points’ filings →