Skip to content

Dowling, ON · Charitable organization

Larchwood Bible Chapel

Providing for the spiritual welfare of the congregation supporting church programs and missionary works

C$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$400k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camp Aush-Bik-KoongC$12,795
Our Daily BreadC$2,000
Missionary Services CanadaC$2,000
Teen ChallengeC$2,000
All Tribes CampC$2,000
Harvest MinistriesC$1,200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$170k · 7 repeat orgsC$10k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

C$170k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+114%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Camp Aush Bik Koong
    6× · 2017–2022 · C$70k · revenue +70%
  • TC
    Teen Challenge North
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$11k · revenue +57%
  • OD
    Our Daily Bread
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • TC
    Teen Challenge North
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k
  • FF
    Falls Foodgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue +114%
  • ES
    ELGIN ST. MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$350 · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Faith Mission (in Canada)

Preaching the gospel primarily in rural locations including the holding of religious programs for children youth and adults. We run camps and conferences for women men youth and children at centres in BC Alberta Quebec and Ontario.

—
2
Harvest Mission to the Unreached

We preach and teach the good news of the bible. we support missions and missionaries in india in order to propagate the christian faith. we provide food clothing and other basic needs to the poor people in india. we conducts free medical…

—
3
Ariel Ministries Canada

Publication of brochures and manuscripts containing religious information; bible study; camp; support of mission and evangelization work

—
4
Mission One Eleven Canada

To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.

—
5
European Missions Inc.

Missions work in the United Kingdom Albania Croatia and Iceland. This work includes: Operation of summer camps and assistance in church planting.

—
6
Lifegiving Ministries

Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.

—
7
All Nations Church Sudbury

Northern association of baptist churches baptist convention youth missions camp norland elgin street mission cjtk christian radio first steps campus crusade laurentian christian fellowship youth with a mission lifeline ministries

—
8
The Gospel Message

Production of weekly radio broadcasts and sent to radio station for broadcasting on radio. transmitters internationally production of cd's to send stations and individuals as requested.

—
9
Missionfest Toronto
—
10
Northern Canada Evangelical Mission Inc.

NCEM Inc missionaries present God's Word through personal visits public services radio and television broadcasting literature production and distribution audio and video media production/distribution and children's camps.

—
11
Wilderness Ministries Inc

Gospel music worship concerts with Canada's Double Portion. Family camp meetings and retreats at WMB camp. Operate a 24 hour F.M. gospel station at Nipawin SK.

—
12
Great Commission Media Ministries

Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Africa Inland Mission International (Canada) and the most unlike its peers is Elgin Street Mission (Sudbury). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCamp Aush Bik Koong — C$70,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetTeen Challenge North — C$11,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOur Daily Bread — C$10,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHarvest Ministries — C$9,600 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetAfrica Inland Mission (Canada) — C$7,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMissionary Services Canada — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAll Tribes Camp — C$2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFalls Food — C$1,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetELGIN ST. MISSION — C$350 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camp Aush Bik Koong ↗
  • Who funds Teen Challenge North ↗
  • Who funds Our Daily Bread ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Africa Inland Mission (Canada) ↗
  • Who funds Missionary Services Canada ↗
  • Who funds All Tribes Camp ↗
  • Who funds Falls Food ↗
  • Who funds ELGIN ST. MISSION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PayPal Giving Fund CanadaON3.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119006963:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Larchwood Bible Chapel’s filings →