Langley, BC · Charitable organization
Langley Mennonite Fellowship
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k7 grants · C$19k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mennonite Church British Columbia | C$10,000 |
| Mennonite Church Canada | C$6,000 |
| Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) British Columbia | C$5,150 |
| Community Justice Initiatives | C$5,000 |
| M2W2 | C$1,000 |
| Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary | C$550 |
| Mennonite World Conference | C$500 |
| Pacific Centre for Discipleship | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MCMennonite Church British Columbia8× · 2017–2024 · C$52k · revenue +332%
- MCMENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE BRITISH COLUMBIA8× · 2017–2024 · C$50k · revenue +407%
- CJCommunity Justice Iniative8× · 2017–2024 · C$40k · revenue +15%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Mennonite Church British Columbia ↗
- Who funds MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE BRITISH COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds Community Justice Iniative ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Mennonite Centre in Ukraine ↗
- Who funds Pacific Centre for Discipleship ↗
- Who funds Mennnonite World Conference ↗
- Who funds Langley Hospital Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.