Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Lamont, AB · Charitable organization

Lamont Alliance Church

Place of worship regular sunday services youth program bible study vacation bible school

C$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$12k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$6k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
C$5,597
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WESTERN CANADIAN DISTRICT OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARC$11,955
THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE IN CANADAC$5,597
SHILOH REBMAN YOUTH RANCH SOCIETYC$336
LAMONT HAMPER COMMITTEEC$150
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$65k · 4 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

C$65k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+59%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$336 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WESTERN CANADIAN DISTRICT OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONAR
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$50k · revenue +25%
  • FN
    First Nations Alliance Church
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$2k · revenue +11%
  • LH
    LAMONT HAMPER COMMITTEE
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$920 · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TC
    Teen Challengegraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +28%
  • AU
    Ambrose Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE WESTERN CANADIAN DISTRICT OF THE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONAR — C$49,783 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE IN CANADA — C$12,627 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Nations Alliance Church — C$1,970 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTeen Challenge — C$1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMONT HAMPER COMMITTEE — C$920 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmbrose University — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHILOH REBMAN YOUTH RANCH SOCIETY — C$336 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119004745:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Lamont Alliance Church’s filings →