Gorham, ON · Charitable organization
Lakeview Presbyterian Church
Presbyterian church operations - weekly christian worship services - local outreach - bible study groups - support of programs and missions administered by the presbyterian church in canada.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Presbyterian Church in Canada | C$13,146 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SAST ANDREWS SOUP KITCHEN INC5× · 2017–2021 · C$4k · revenue +225%
- TSThe Salvation Army - Thunder Bay3× · 2017–2019 · C$900 · revenue +614%
- TMThe Mission to Seafarers: Port of Thunder Bay3× · 2017–2019 · C$600 · revenue +36%
Funded once
- MFMucic for Lifeone grant, 2017 · C$810 · revenue -41%
- EFEvangelical Free Churchone grant, 2018 · C$200
- EAEVERGREEN: A UNITED NEIGHBOURHOODgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$200 · revenue +121%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food distribution service to those who can't adequately provide for their own nutritional needs
Construction of simple affordable housing and provision of interest-free mortgages and conditional forgiveness of second mortgages for qualified families in need of assistance
Operate a drop in centre targeting the most needy of Thunder Bay.
The charity continued to rent its facilities on loon lake to other charities providing camping opportunities for their children. renewal of its facilities over as much as a decade neared completion.
To promote support and protect the status and interest of people with a developmental disability and the general well-being and welfare of such persons; To solicit receive and hold contributions of money and property; To raise and hold…
A combined effort by the citizens of north bay ( both private and corporate ) to supply assemble and distribute baskets of food and toys to families in need for christmas.
To relieve poverty by providing food and other basic supplies to persons of low income by establishing operating and maintaining a food bank.
Food bank Free clothing depot community outreach women/men's group
Public Library that provides programming and library collections to the public. Provides meeting spaces for community members. Holds community events.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St. Andrew Soup Kitchen Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Music for Life Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Presbyterian Church In Canada ↗
- Who funds ST ANDREWS SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds The Salvation Army - Thunder Bay ↗
- Who funds Regional Food Distribution Association ↗
- Who funds Mucic for Life ↗
- Who funds The Mission to Seafarers: Port of Thunder Bay ↗
- Who funds Thunder Bay Emergency Shelter ↗
- Who funds THUNDER BAY CHRISTMAS CHEER ↗
- Who funds Evangelical Free Church (MEMO) ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN: A UNITED NEIGHBOURHOOD ↗
- Who funds ST. JOSEH'S FOUNDATION OF THUNDER BAY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ukrainian Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Eastern Canada · United Way of Thunder Bay · The Paterson Foundation · Thunder Bay Community Foundation · Church of the Holy Cross · Hydro One Employees' and Pensioners' Charity Trust Fund · BenefAction Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.