Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Lac Marois Union Church
To conduct worship services for residents cottagers and visitors to the community.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | C$600 |
| MAISON EMMANUEL FOUNDATION | C$600 |
| HABILITAS FOUNDATION | C$600 |
| RESILIENCE MONREAL | C$600 |
| SAINT COLUMBA HOUSE | C$600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 34% of grant dollars (C$27k). The 66% that went abroad (C$52k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 66% of all-years giving (C$52k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +109% since the first grant, against +93% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SMSAINT MICHAEL'S MISSION5× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue +467%
- TETemple Emmanuel Beth Sholom3× · 2017–2019 · C$1k · revenue +22%
- FAFondation Auberge Madeleine2× · 2017–2018 · C$800 · revenue +109%
Funded once
- P(PAMOJA (JACKSON MAYALA MEDICAL SCHOOL TUITION PROJECT) ASSOCone grant, 2020 · C$13k
- PMPAMOJA-JACKSON MAHAL MED SCHOOL TUITIONone grant, 2019 · C$11k
- P(PAMOJA (JACKSON MAYALA MEDICAL SCHOOL TUITION) ASSOCIATED WIone grant, 2021 · C$8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes
Services de dépannage alimentaire aux personnes aux prises avec des difficultés financières ou autres
Accompagnement et support aux personnes en difficulté.
Resource pour les personnes itinérantes à Montréal
Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentés ou en difficulté temporaire avec ou sans enfant
Aide aux anorexiques-boulimiques
Maison d'hébergement pour femmes violentées et en difficulté accompagnées ou non de leurs enfants.
Service qui favorisent la sécurité alimentaire
Maison d'hébergement pour femmes vlolentées
Panier de noel panier de la rentrée
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La mission St-Michael/St.Michael's mission and the most unlike its peers is St Paul's High School Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAISON EMMANUEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT MICHAEL'S MISSION ↗
- Who funds RESILIENCE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds Temple Emmanuel Beth Sholom ↗
- Who funds Fondation Auberge Madeleine ↗
- Who funds HABILITAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUPE ET COMPAGNIE DES PAYS D'EN HAUT ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S HIGH SCHOOL BURSARY FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The George Hogg Family Foundation · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.