Laval, QC · Charitable organization
La Société Des Dames Philoptochos de L'Église Orthodoxe Grecque Holy Cross - Laval
To provide for the needs of the community its activities and to assist the members and/or families in need.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREEN ORTHODOXE METROPOLIS TORONTO | C$6,610 |
| MONASTERY VIERGE MARIE CONSOLATRICE | C$1,495 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$500 |
| HELLENIC COMMUNITY OF GREATER MONTREAL | C$500 |
| FOUNDATION ST. JUSTINE HOSPITAL | C$200 |
| THE MONTREAL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$200 |
| OLD BREWERY MISSION | C$200 |
| GENERATION FOUNDATION | C$200 |
| PHILOPTOCHOS ST. NICOLAS CHURCH | C$40 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 87% of grant dollars (C$60k). The 13% that went abroad (C$9k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 13% of all-years giving (C$9k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HCHELLENIC COMMUNITY OF GREATER MONTREAL4× · 2018–2023 · C$4k · revenue +9%
- OBOld Brewery Mission7× · 2017–2023 · C$2k · revenue +83%
- PSPHILOPTOCHOS ST. NICOLAS CHURCH3× · 2017–2023 · C$915 · revenue +53%
Funded once
- MVMONASTER VIERGE MARIE CONSOLATRICEone grant, 2022 · C$7k
- GOGREEK ORTHODOX METROPOLIS TORONTOone grant, 2018 · C$5k
- HCHELLENIC COMMUNITY OF GREATER MONTREALone grant, 2020 · C$300
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.