Montreal, QC · Private foundation
La Fondation Mirador
L'organisme a appuyé des fondations qui sont des donataires reconnus.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$7k
- C$10k–50k3 grants · C$70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION PÈRE SABLON | C$30,000 |
| FONDATION PAPILLON | C$30,000 |
| FONDATION HEC MONTRÉAL | C$10,000 |
| FONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU | C$5,000 |
| HUDSON MUSIC FESTIVAL | C$2,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FPFondation Père Sablon8× · 2017–2024 · C$2.2M · revenue +109%
- FHFondation HEC Montréal5× · 2017–2024 · C$90k · revenue +51%
- FPFONDATION PAPILLON2× · 2023–2024 · C$50k · revenue +15%
Funded once
- FDFondation du Musée des Beaux-Arts de Montréalgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$25k · revenue +71%
- CDConseil des Abenakis de Wolinakone grant, 2018 · C$15k
- FCFONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAUone grant, 2022 · C$5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal
Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Assistance financière au collège françois-de-laval pour le financement de projets spéciaux comme la rénovation des locaux le renouvellement du parc informatique et la mise à niveau des équipements sportifs
Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal
Campagne de financement et souper bénéfice
La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.
Camnpage de financement et remises de bourses aux étudiants
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Hec Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Nova Hudson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wcpd Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.