Chicoutimi, QC · Public foundation
La Fondation Mgr Leonce Bouchard Inc.
Assurer la perennité des oeuvres fondées par mgr bouchard tout en créant une solidarité entre les groupes et les responsables de plus elle aide financièrement les organismes ayant une mission de lutte contre la pauvreté.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ATELIER DE RÉCUPÉRATION ST-JOSEPH | C$25,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MDMAISON DES SANS ABRIS DE CHICOUTIMI3× · 2017–2020 · C$95k · revenue +250%
- MSMoisson Saguenay Lac-St-Jean2× · 2017–2018 · C$20k · revenue +132%
- DDDOMAINE DE L'AMITIÉ DU LAC POUCE2× · 2017–2018 · C$4k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- LSLa Soupe Populaire de Chicoutimigraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$15k · revenue +48%
- ADAssociation des personnes handicapées de Desbiensone grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue -47%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Service de dépannage service de maintien a domicile
Servir des repas et de l'accompagnement à une clientèle de personne défavoriser
Livraison à domicile de repas chauds à des personnes âgées malades handicapées ou en convalescence
Vente d'articles usagés à prix modiques au profit des démunis.
Vente de vetements usagés
Livraison de repas chaud 5 jours par semaine du lundi au vendredi 50 semaines par année. offrier un service à domicile favorisant le maintien à leur résidence des personnes ayant des besoins rendre admissible l'aide alimentaure aux…
Location au ciuss pour clientèle vulnérable
Service de soutien à domicile accompagnement tramsport popote roulante aide à l'épicerie. 100 bénévoles plus de 6000 heures de bénévolat par année.
Recueuillir et distribuer aux personnes démunies nourritures vêtements meubles appareils ménagers et autres
Services en maintien à domicile prainés fait par des bénévoles *popote roulante *acc-transport médical
Accompagnement et soutient aux personnes démunies et/ou aux prise avec des problèmes d'alcoolisme toxicomanie ou autre dépendances.
Favoriser le soutien à domicile des personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie des personnes handicapées et autres personnes dans le besoin en offrant un service de préparation de repas sains livrés à domicile.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maison D'accueil Pour Sans-Abri De Chicoutimi Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Atelier de récupération St-Joseph inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAISON DES SANS ABRIS DE CHICOUTIMI ↗
- Who funds ATELIER DE RÉCUPÉRATION ST-JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds LA SOUPE POPULAIRE DE CHICOUTIMI ↗
- Who funds Moisson Saguenay Lac-St-Jean ↗
- Who funds La Soupe Populaire de Chicoutimi ↗
- Who funds DOMAINE DE L'AMITIÉ DU LAC POUCE ↗
- Who funds Comptoir multiservice de Falardeau ↗
- Who funds Association des personnes handicapées de Desbiens ↗
- Who funds PORTES OUVERTES AUX PASSANTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Centraide Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean Inc. · Les Augustines de la Miséricorde de Jésus du Monastère Saint-Augustin · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.