Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

La Fondation Lara Drummond/Lara Drummond Foundation

Charitable programs carried on directly by the foundation or indirectly by means of qualified donees especially in fields of education hospitals health research and aid to the destitute.

C$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k9 grants · C$140k
C$10,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCGILL UNIVERSITYC$30,000
MONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITALC$20,000
FONDATION BMPC$20,000
CVR EDUCATION FOUNDATIONC$20,000
PLEINS RAYONSC$10,000
HORIZON POUR ELLE INCC$10,000
FONDATION MARIE VINCENTC$10,000
ADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATIONC$10,000
FOUNDATION JEAN MARC PAQUETTE (SAFIR)C$10,000
SOCIETE PROTECTRICE DES ANIMAUX DES CANTONSC$5,000
CENTRE DE SERVICES SCOLAIRE DE SAINT-HYACINTHEC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$903k · 11 repeat orgsC$93k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

C$903k
C$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+86%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BROME MISSISQUOI PERKINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$286k · revenue +81%
  • MU
    MCGILL UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$245k · revenue +41%
  • CE
    CVR EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$120k · revenue +152% · 53% of their budget

Funded once

  • MS
    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$23k · revenue +47%
  • CS
    CAMP SOLEIL DE MELISSAgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$20k · revenue +120%
  • SY
    SUN YOUTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$12k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
2
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
3
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
4
Fondation du Centre des Sciences de Montréal / Montreal Science Centre Foundation

La fondaiton a pour but de promouvoir une meilleure connaissance et compréhension de la science des technologies et de leur histoire.

—
5
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
6
Fondation De L'institut Universitaire En SantÉ Mentale De MontrÉAl
—
7
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

Soins hospitaliers

—
8
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
9
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
10
L'Institut international de Montréal pour l'environnement / the Montreal international institute for the environment
—
11
La Fondation Jean Meloche /the Jean Meloche Foundation

Aide au développement de la relève de diverses disciplines et de centres d'excellence qui visent le soulagement de la souffrance ou de l'incapacité physique ou mentale.

—
12
Fondation de l'institut de tourisme et d'hôtellerie du québec

Gestion d'une variété de collectes de fonds qui servent à soutenir financièrement au moyen de dons le développement de l'institut de tourisme et d'hôtellerie du québec incluant celui de ses élèves ses professeurs et ses outils pédagogiques…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is La Résidence Fulford / Fulford Residence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
19/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBROME MISSISQUOI PERKINS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$286,000 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetMCGILL UNIVERSITY — C$245,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCVR EDUCATION FOUNDATION — C$120,000 over 6y, 53% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS FOUNDATION — C$77,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetMONTREAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — C$50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MARIE VINCENT — C$30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETE PROTECTRICE DES ANIMAUX DES CANTONS — C$30,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES — C$23,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SOLEIL DE MELISSA — C$20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHORIZON POUR ELLE INC — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPLEINS RAYONS — C$20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLE GROUPE COMMUNAUTAIRE L'ITINÉRAIRE — C$15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSUN YOUTH — C$12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRASER-HICKSON INSTITUTE — C$12,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetFOUNDATION JEAN MARC PAQUETTE (SAFIR) — C$10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCENTRE DE SERVICES SCOLAIRE DE SAINT-HYACINTHE — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$3,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTYNDALE ST-GEORGES — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBATSHAW FOUNDATION — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Fondation J Armand Bo…Fondation de la famil…R. Howard Webster Fou…La Fondation du Grand…The J W McConnell Fam…Fondation Famille Lég…Hylcan Foundation / L…Hewitt FoundationMorris and Rosalind G…Fondation Sibylla Hes…The Highwater Foundat…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC11.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Fondation de la famille Zeller · R. Howard Webster Foundation / Fondation R. Howard Webster · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · The J W McConnell Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille J W McConnell · Fondation Famille Léger · Hylcan Foundation / La Fondation Hylcan · Hewitt Foundation · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Fondation Sibylla Hesse · The Highwater Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 119001261:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on La Fondation Lara Drummond/Lara Drummond’s filings →