Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Val-Morin, QC · Private foundation

La Fondation Jean Meloche /The Jean Meloche Foundation

Aide au développement de la relève de diverses disciplines et de centres d'excellence qui visent le soulagement de la souffrance ou de l'incapacité physique ou mentale.

C$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$12k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$20k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION MÉCALES DES LAURENTIDES ET DES PAYS-D'EN-HAUTC$10,000
HÔPITAL GÉNÉRAL JUIF DE MONTRÉALC$10,000
FONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINEC$5,000
FONDS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU COLLÈGE JEAN-DE-BRÉBEUFC$5,000
FONDATION À PAS DE GÉANTC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$306k · 8 repeat orgsC$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

C$306k
C$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HG
    HÔPITAL GÉNÉRLA JUIF DE MONTRÉAL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$158k · revenue +31%
  • FM
    FONDATION MÉCALES DES LAURENTIDES ET DES PAYS-D'EN-HAUT
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$55k · revenue +82%
  • FD
    FONDS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU COLLÈGE JEAN-DE-BRÉBEUF
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$24k · revenue +6%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

    03Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    La Fondation de l'Université Laval
    —
    2
    Fondation du Chu de Québec

    Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

    —
    3
    Fondation Amj-Js
    —
    4
    Fondation Jonquière-Médic
    —
    5
    Fondation Educative Jean-Jacques-Bertrand

    Campagne de financement et souper bénéfice

    —
    6
    La Fondation Santé
    —
    7
    Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

    La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

    —
    8
    Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

    Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

    —
    9
    Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

    Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

    —
    10
    Fondation de l'hôpital Jean-Talon

    Contribuer à l'amélioration de la qualité des soins et des services offerts à la clientèle et à la promotion de la santé dans la communauté en soutenant financièrement le développement de l'hôpital jean-talon et du ciusss du…

    —
    11
    Fondation de l'hôpital Lasalle

    Recueillir et administrer des fonds pour effectuer des dons en équipements à l'hôpital de lasalle afin de renouveler 'équipement médical spécialisé.

    —
    12
    Fondation Lajemmerais
    —

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation du Collège Jean-de-Brébeuf and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Lise Watier. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    02the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

    Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%C$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHÔPITAL GÉNÉRLA JUIF DE MONTRÉAL — C$157,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MÉCALES DES LAURENTIDES ET DES PAYS-D'EN-HAUT — C$55,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFONDS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU COLLÈGE JEAN-DE-BRÉBEUF — C$23,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFONDS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU COLLÉGE JEAN-DE-BRÉBEUF — C$20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION DE L'HÔPITAL RÉGIONAL DE SAINT- JÉRÔME — C$20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION CHU SAINTE-JUSTINE — C$15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION À PAS DE GÉANT — C$14,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION LISE WATIER — C$700 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Wcpd FoundationJewish Community Foun…Fondation Philantra P…CN Employees' and Pen…Fondation Bon Départ …United Way East Ontar…United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
    Wcpd FoundationON8.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Wcpd Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Philantra Philantra Foundation · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Fondation Bon Départ de Canadian Tire du Québec Inc. · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

    Source object 885361550:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

    Play a game based on La Fondation Jean Meloche /The Jean Meloche’s filings →