Skip to content

Valleyfield, QC · Public foundation

La Fondation Du Club Rotary de Valleyfield Inc.

Aide aux jeunes défavorisis aide aux personnes legéea aide aux personnes avec déficiencer physiques

C$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$7,000
COMITE DES FÊTES 150 E VALLEYFIELDC$5,000
CLUB JOIE DE VIVREC$3,000
Individual grant recipientC$3,000
Individual grant recipientC$2,500
FONDATION CLUB ROTARY INTERNATIONALC$2,500
CLUB ROTARY BROCKVILLEC$2,000
FONDATION ECOLE BAIE ST-FRANCOISC$1,000
MOULIN DE LA SOURCEC$1,000
Individual grant recipientC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$132k · 12 repeat orgsC$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against +84% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

C$132k
C$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+84%

Still filing today

75%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • A1
    Anti-Chembre 12-17
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$36k · revenue +138%
  • MS
    MOISSON SUD-OUEST
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$22k · revenue +63%
  • FN
    FOOTBALL NOIR ET OR
    3× · 2019–2022 · C$14k · revenue +281%

Funded once

  • OS
    OLYMPIQUES SPECIAUX QUEBEC
    one grant, 2019 · C$5k
  • LP
    LA POPOTE ROULANTEgraduated
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$5k · revenue +40%
  • FR
    FONDATION ROTARY INTER PAUL HARRIS
    one grant, 2021 · C$3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Repit Jeunesse

Venir en aide aux jeunes en difficultés favoriser le développement de leur autonomie et d'éduquer la population à une meilleure compréhension des jeunes en difficultés.

—
2
Maison Véro & Louis (Varennes)

Maison d'hébergement pour des adultes autistes

—
3
L'entraide De La Vallee

Améliorer l'efficacité des organismes communautaires en approvisionnement alimentaire. - soulager la pauvreté en subvenant aux besoins essentiels des personnes pauvres dans le besoin démunies ou à faible revenu en leur offrant des outils…

—
4
Le Repas du Passant

Service qui favorisent la sécurité alimentaire

—
5
La Libellule pour les Personnes Vivant avec une Déficience Intellectuelle et leurs Proches

Soutenir les personnes vivant avec un déficience intellectuelle dans leur développement. faire la promotion de leurs intérêts et oeuvrer à l'amélioration de leurs conditions de vie.

—
6
Sentier du nouveau jour

Aider accueillir héberger et dépanner des personnes aux prises avec des dépendances aux drogues à l’alcool ou aux médicaments.

—
7
La Maison Le Coudrier

Développer les capacités des personnes lourdement handicapées physiquement afin qu'elles puissent vivre en milieu résidentiel et en société en leur fournissant des legements adaptés tout en respectant leur intégrité physique et marale leur…

—
8
Groupe d'entraide leGESTE

Épicerie de quartier avec objectif de favoriser l'autonomie alimentaire chez les personnes/familles fragilisées économiquement rabais de 25% aux personnes les plus démunis offrir des aliments frais repas préparés et complets

—
9
Maison Lémerveil Suzanne Vachon

Offrir des services aux jeunes polyhandicapés et aux enfants gravement malades des séjours de répit et de soins palliatifs pédiatriques tout au long de leur parcours de vie. de plus l'organisme n'est pas assujetti à l'impôt sur le revenu.

—
10
Bouffe Pontiac

Offrir à toute personne dans le besoin l'accès à une nourriture saine et de l'information pouvant améliorer sa qualité de vie.

—
11
Café Partage d'Argenteuil

Soulager la pauvreté et contribuer à la sécurité alimentaire de personnes démunies en opérant une épierie économique offrant des denrées à faible prix offrir aux personnes démunies un lieu communautaire aux fins de briser leur isolement…

—
12
Diabete Des Draveurs

Organisme qui vise à informer sensibiliser

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Le Pacte de Rue Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Moisson Sud-Ouest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAnti-Chembre 12-17 — C$36,102 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetMOISSON SUD-OUEST — C$22,332 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFOOTBALL NOIR ET OR — C$14,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCLUB JOIE DE VIVRE — C$5,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMOULIN DE LA SOURCE — C$5,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLA POPOTE ROULANTE — C$4,832 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRE NOUVEL ENVOL — C$4,350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREPIT ZEPHYR — C$3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLiberte de Choisir — C$2,700 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFondation Centre Aimé Leduc — C$2,400 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBÉBÉ LAYETTE — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetLES PAS POUR RIRE — C$1,500 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetACCUEIL POUR ELLE — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOLE GRAND DEFI PIERRE LAVOIE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEnsemble Courons Vers la Guerison — C$500 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetO.V.P.A.C. — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Anti-Chembre 12-17 ↗
  • Who funds MOISSON SUD-OUEST ↗
  • Who funds FOOTBALL NOIR ET OR ↗
  • Who funds CLUB JOIE DE VIVRE ↗
  • Who funds MOULIN DE LA SOURCE ↗
  • Who funds LA POPOTE ROULANTE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE NOUVEL ENVOL ↗
  • Who funds REPIT ZEPHYR ↗
  • Who funds Liberte de Choisir ↗
  • Who funds Fondation Centre Aimé Leduc ↗
  • Who funds BÉBÉ LAYETTE ↗
  • Who funds LES PAS POUR RIRE ↗
  • Who funds ACCUEIL POUR ELLE ↗
  • Who funds GOLE GRAND DEFI PIERRE LAVOIE ↗
  • Who funds Ensemble Courons Vers la Guerison ↗
  • Who funds O.V.P.A.C. ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centre du partage de Valleyfield Inc.QC13.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centre du partage de Valleyfield Inc. · Les Oeuvres Du Club Richelieu Salaberry-De-Valleyfield · Fondation Bon Départ de Canadian Tire du Québec Inc. · Fondation Laure Gaudreault · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Conam Charitable Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 887649614:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on La Fondation Du Club Rotary de Valleyfield’s filings →