Skip to content
Canadian charities

Lachine, QC · Public foundation

LA fondation communautaire de Lachine/The Lachine Community Foundation

Supports various charitable organizations

C$93k
Granted FY2023
11
Grants FY2023
1
Regions reached
C$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$33k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$60k
C$6,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BANQUE ALIMENTAIRE RESURRECTION DE LACHINEC$30,000
LE RELAIS POPULAIRE DE LACHINEC$10,000
LE PARADOS INC.C$10,000
FONDATION KIWANIS-LAKESHOREC$10,000
WEST ISLAND VOLUNTEER BUREAUC$6,000
PARKINSON QUEBECC$6,000
NOVA HEALTH WEST ISLANDC$5,000
HUNTONGTON SOCIETY OF CANADAC$5,000
CENTRE BIENVENUE INC.C$5,000
FONDATION S.S. VAUDREUIL SOLANGEC$4,000
DIABETE QUEBECC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$410k · 17 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

C$410k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+6%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FONDATION CENTRE HOSPITALIER LACHINE
    5× · 2018–2022 · C$78k · revenue +111%
  • LP
    LE PARADOS INC.
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$35k · revenue +112%
  • FS
    FONDATION S.S. VAUDREUIL SOLANGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$30k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • NH
    NOVA HEALTH WEST ISLAND
    one grant, 2022 · C$3k
  • FJ
    FONDATION JACQUES LANDRY
    one grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Des BÉNÉVoles Du Centre D'hÉBergement De Lachine
—
2
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
3
Association De L'acidose Lactique Du Saguenay - Lac-Saint-Jean

Recherche afin de trouver u traitement efficace contre la maladie de l'acidose lactique.

—
4
Les Benevoles Centre Hospitalier Regional De Lanaudiere Chrd

Services bénévoles d'accompagnement et de soutien aux malades du centre hospitalier régional de lanaudière c.h.r.d.l.

—
5
Maison des aînés de Lavaltrie

Soulager les conditions de vie associées au vieillissement contribuer au maintien de l'autonomie des personnes ainées

—
6
Fondation Aline Letendre

Aider le centre intégré de santé et services sociaux de la montérégie-est (hôtel-dieu) à poursuivre ses objectifs en lui faisant des dons. (ex. équipement et appareils médicaux)

—
7
Association des personnes vivant avec une surdité de laval
—
8
Fondation Groupes-Parrains Quebec-Centre Inc

Fournir des denrées alimentaires ou autres à des familles en difficulté indentifiées au préalable par le c.l.s.c. basseville vanier.

—
9
Fondation Du Diabete Laval Laurentides

Organiser des levées de fonds pour des activités dans le domaine du diabète. distribuer à d'autres organismes de même nature (diabète) des fonds. recevoir des dons legs testamentaires et autres contributions.

—
10
Maison de soins palliatifs de Laval inc.

De gérer une maison de type familiale pouvant accueillir gratuitement des personnes adultes en fin de vie entourées de leur proches.

—
11
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
12
Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services sociaux de Laval
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Le relais populaire inc. and the most unlike its peers is Huntington Society of Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBANQUE ALIMENTAIRE RESURRECTION DE LACHINE — C$132,000 over 6y, 55% of budgetFONDATION CENTRE HOSPITALIER LACHINE — C$77,750 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetLE PARADOS INC. — C$35,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFONDATION S.S. VAUDREUIL SOLANGE — C$30,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLE RELAIS POPULAIRE DE LACHINE — C$21,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHuntington Society of Canada — C$20,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDiabete Quebec — C$13,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNOVA HEALTH WEST ISLAND — C$10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFONDATION KIWANIS-LAKESHORE — C$10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPARKINSON QUEBEC — C$9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAssociation de charité La Guignolée de Lachine — C$8,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetWEST ISLAND VOLUNTEER BUREAU — C$7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWest Island Palliative Care Residence — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION JACQUES LANDRY — C$3,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLes Jeunes Naturalistes — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetClub de personnes handicappés du Lac St-Louis — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BANQUE ALIMENTAIRE RESURRECTION DE LACHINE ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION CENTRE HOSPITALIER LACHINE ↗
  • Who funds LE PARADOS INC. ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION S.S. VAUDREUIL SOLANGE ↗
  • Who funds LE RELAIS POPULAIRE DE LACHINE ↗
  • Who funds Huntington Society of Canada ↗
  • Who funds Diabete Quebec ↗
  • Who funds NOVA HEALTH WEST ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION KIWANIS-LAKESHORE ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON QUEBEC ↗
  • Who funds Association de charité La Guignolée de Lachine ↗
  • Who funds WEST ISLAND VOLUNTEER BUREAU ↗
  • Who funds West Island Palliative Care Residence ↗
  • Who funds FONDATION JACQUES LANDRY ↗
  • Who funds Les Jeunes Naturalistes ↗
  • Who funds Club de personnes handicappés du Lac St-Louis ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation St-HubertCentraide Du Grand Mo…Fondation Luc MauriceCN Employees' and Pen…Jewish Community Foun…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…United Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Fondation St-HubertQC8.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation St-Hubert · Centraide Du Grand Montréal · Fondation Luc Maurice · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 118988310:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on LA fondation communautaire de Lachine/The Lachine’s filings →