Skip to content

Sherbrooke, QC · Public foundation

La Fondation Communautaire de L'Estrie

Détention de placements en vue de distribuer ces revenus pour les fins de bienfaisance.

C$384k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$225k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k15 grants · C$56k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$48k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$280k
C$4,172
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORFORD MUSIQUEC$225,000
CORPORATION DE CONSERVATION DU BOISÉ DE JOHNVILLEC$55,267
FONDATION DU CAMP MUSICAL D'ASBESTOSC$33,442
HANDI-APTEC$15,000
FONDATION NATURE MEMPHRÉMAGOGC$8,205
CENTRAIDE ESTRIEC$6,765
NOURRI-SOURCE ESTRIEC$5,000
FONDATION GILLES DAOUSTC$5,000
LES SOUPAPES DE LA BONNE HUMEURC$5,000
CORRIDOR APPALACHIENC$4,172
AUTISME ESTRIEC$3,440
ASSOCIATION POUR L'HÉBERGEMENT DES PERSONNESC$3,440
LES ÉTINCELLES DE BONHEUR DU HAUT-SAINTC$3,440
LA MAISON CAMÉLÉON DE L'ESTRIEC$3,440
VILLA PIERROTC$2,663
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$714k · 18 repeat orgsC$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

C$714k
C$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%
+51%

Still filing today

100%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FONDATION DU CAMP MUSICAL D'ASBESTOS
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$154k · revenue +33% · 51% of their budget
  • CD
    CORPORATION DE CONSERVATION DU BOISÉ DE JOHNVILLE
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$65k · revenue +169%
  • AE
    Autisme Estrie
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$40k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • FP
    FONDATION POUR L'ACCESIBILITE DES SERVICES STIMULATION PEDAG
    one grant, 2017 · C$11k · revenue -66%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature-Avenir

Conservation des milieux naturels.

—
2
Fiducie de conservation du patrimoine naturel de Rigaud

Acquisition de terrain à haute valeur écologique pour fin de conservation à perpétuité

—
3
Fondation pour la nature Asselin-Chicobi
—
4
Fondation Environnement Culture Mrc De Montmagny

Éducation de la population sur la riche histoire de la faune et de la culture de la région / aucune demande dans l'année

—
5
Societe Protectrice Des Animaux Beauce-Etchemin
—
6
Fondation Quebecoise Pour La Protection Du Patrimoine Naturel
—
7
Societe De Conservation Du Corridor Naturel De La Riviere Au Saumon (S.C.C.N.R.S.)

Surveillances de propriétés protégées

—
8
Capitale Nature

Assurer le maintien et la résilience des milieux naturels de la biodiversité et des biens et des services écologiques dans les régions de la capitale-nationale et de chaudière-appalaches par la conservation l'acquisition l'intendance la…

—
9
Arbres Et Nature - QuÉBec

protection de l'environnement en identifiant et administrant a perpétuité des terres du Québec

—
10
La Fondation Foret Boucher

Sensibilisation à la protection de la forêt et des forêts urbaines. protection des écosystèmes de la forêts boucher.

—
11
Fondation Des Amis Du Parc OmÉGa

Depuis le lancement de la fondation l'objectif est de promouvoir la protection des animaux et espèces menacées la recherche en biodiversité les arts et la santé.

—
12
Parc Nature de Pointe-aux-Outardes

Oeuvre dans la préservation et la mise en valeur d'un parc comprenant huit écosytèmes.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Du Patrimoine De Saint-Venant-De-Paquette and the most unlike its peers is Croquarium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORFORD MUSIQUE — C$230,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CAMP MUSICAL D'ASBESTOS — C$154,470 over 5y, 51% of budgetCORPORATION DE CONSERVATION DU BOISÉ DE JOHNVILLE — C$65,017 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetAutisme Estrie — C$40,417 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetMAISON CAMÉLÉON — C$33,717 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetLES SOUPAPGES DE LA BONNE HUMEUR — C$32,850 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetCENTRAIDE ESTRIE — C$29,371 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLES ETINCELLES DE BONHEUR DU HSF — C$22,917 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetHANDI-APTE — C$20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetLES ENFANTS GIOIA — C$19,749 over 3y, 13% of budgetFONDATION NATURE MEMPHRÉMAGOG — C$16,766 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCORRIDOR APPALACHIEN — C$16,627 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION POUR L'ACCESIBILITE DES SERVICES STIMULATION PEDAG — C$11,400 over 1y, 18% of budgetAQUEPA ESTRIE — C$8,045 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetLes amis du patrimoine de Saint-Venant-de-Paquette — C$7,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetVILLA PIERROT — C$6,817 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCCONSERVATION DES VALLONS DE LA SERPENTINE — C$5,356 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetASSOCIATION DE CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE — C$5,331 over 5y, 41% of budgetAZIMUT NORD — C$5,170 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFONDATION BAILLAIRGÉ — C$5,138 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCroquarium — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNOURRI-SOURCE ESTRIE — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetCAMP MASSAWIPI-CENTRE MACKAY — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION GILLES DAOUST — C$5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetFONDATION POUR LA SAUVEGARDE DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES — C$4,274 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetASSOCIATION POUR L'HÉBERGEMENT DES PERSONNES — C$3,440 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetREGROUPEMENT DES ARCHIVES DU SÉMINAIRE DE SHERBROOKE ET L'AR — C$2,900 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASSOCIATION DE CONSERVATION DU MONT-ÉCHO — C$2,598 over 5y, 8.8% of budgetFESTIVAL-CONCOURS DE MUSIQUE DE SHERBROOKE ET DE LA REGION D — C$500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fondation canadienne FCSCJQC11× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fondation canadienne FCSCJ · Les Petites Soeurs de la Sainte-Famille · Soeurs Missionnaires de Notre-Dame Des Anges · Centraide Estrie (Conseil Régional de Bien-Être de Sherbrooke) · Fondation Défi Everest · The Nature Conservancy of Canada/La Societe Canadienne Pour la Conservation de la Nature · Fondation Famille Benoit · Fondation J Armand Bombardier · Fondation Laure Gaudreault · Fondation Desjardins · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 861419083:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on La Fondation Communautaire de L'Estrie’s filings →