Montreal, QC · Public foundation
La Fondation Berthiaume Du Tremblay
Employer et utiliser à titre prorotaire les ressources et les biens de la corporation à la construction de l'équipement et à l'administration d'une ou plusieurs maisons d'accueil pour personnes âgées dans le besoin.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k2 grants · C$10k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$47k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$178k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRÉSÂGES | C$350,000 |
| LE GUARTIER DES GÉNÉRATIONS | C$178,084 |
| RÉSIDENCE BERTHIAUME-DU TREMBLAY | C$27,145 |
| INSTITUT HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE DE MONTRÉAL | C$20,000 |
| UN ET UN FONT MILLE | C$5,000 |
| INSTITUT MALLET | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RBRÉSIDENCE BERTHIAUME-DU TREMBLAY8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.0M · revenue +94%
- LQLE QUARTIER DES GÉNÉRATIONS (COMPAREND UN DON DÉTERMINÉ D...7× · 2018–2024 · C$2.4M · revenue +109% · 72% of their budget
- UMUNIVERSITY MCGILL3× · 2022–2024 · C$60k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- UEUN ET UN FONT MILLEone grant, 2024 · C$5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Suivis téléphoniques diriger les membres vers les ressources adéquates publication d'un bulletin trimestriel assembléés d'information webinaires à l'intention des membres et du public en général
L'organisme exploite un centre d'hébergement de longue durée pour personnes âgées.
Activités bénéfices projets relatif à la mobilité urbaine projets relatif à l'environnement
L'organisme a pour mission de promouvoir l'employabillité des personnes de plus de 40 ans et d'offrir un service spécialisé de consillé et d'accompagnement en recherche d'emploi.
Production et diffusion de Quazette info-lettres mensuelles (10 numéros) blogues (10 billets) Midis-conférences Dégustations de savoir (10 évènements) mise à jour du site web
Hébergement pour personnes âgées autonomes et semi-autonomes
Enseignement et recherche universitaire
Travaux d'analyse et de rédactions et publications des études scientifiques
Activités de recherche scientifique et d'enseignement de 2e et 3e cycle
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association Québécoise des centres communautaires pour ainés and the most unlike its peers is Résidence Berthiaume-Du Tremblay. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PrésÂges ↗
- Who funds RÉSIDENCE BERTHIAUME-DU TREMBLAY ↗
- Who funds LE QUARTIER DES GÉNÉRATIONS (COMPAREND UN DON DÉTERMINÉ D... ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY MCGILL ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION QUÉBÉCOISE DES CENTRES COMMUNAUTAIRES POUR AINÉS ↗
- Who funds INTERGÉNÉRATIONS QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds REGROUPEMENT DES POPOTES ROULANTES ↗
- Who funds Association des retraités d'Ahuntsic ↗
- Who funds INSTITUT MALLET ↗
- Who funds Alliance culturelle L A C ↗
- Who funds UN ET UN FONT MILLE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fondation Mirella & Lino Saputo · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.