Skip to content

Victoriaville, QC · Charitable organization

La Communaute Du Desert Inc.

Maintenir des lieux de vie commune au québec et au pérou et au pérou dans le but d’accueillie des jeunes adultes en formation et/ou en stage.

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RVM-MCQC$3,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$15k · 4 repeat orgsC$1k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

C$15k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+58%

Still filing today

75%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • R
    RVM-MCQ
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$11k · revenue +49%
  • CC
    Café Chrétien
    2× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue -99%
  • FL
    FONDATION LUCIEN LABELLE
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$700 · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • CE
    Centre Emmaus
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue -57%
  • Z
    ZILEOSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$200 · revenue +128%
  • FF
    Fondation Famille au service des pauvres
    one grant, 2017 · C$100

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Maison Des Jeunes De St-FÉLix-De-Valois
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Viateur
—
3
Maison Des Jeunes L'authentique
—
4
Repit Jeunesse

Venir en aide aux jeunes en difficultés favoriser le développement de leur autonomie et d'éduquer la population à une meilleure compréhension des jeunes en difficultés.

—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
6
LudothÈQue De LÉVis

Service de prêt de jeu

—
7
Fondation Richelieu Saint-Jean

Aide financiere a divers organismes venant en aide à la jeunesse

—
8
C a P Accueil Jeunesse

Promouvoir les loisirs sans auprès des jeunes et de les amener à découvrir et développer leurs talents.

—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
10
Maison Des Jeunes De Labrecque

Tenir et animer un lieu de rencontre pour les jeunes.

—
11
Avenue Des Jeunes
—
12
Fondation Dufresne & Gauthier

Analyse des organismes visant soit à soulager la pauvreté soit à aider les jeunes et attribution de dons à ceux-ci

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Emmaus Des Bois-Francs and the most unlike its peers is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Victoire. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRVM-MCQ — C$11,469 over 3y, 21% of budgetCafé Chrétien — C$2,650 over 2y, 17% of budgetFONDATION LUCIEN LABELLE — C$700 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCentre Emmaus — C$500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFabrique St-Victoire — C$500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZILEOS — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSolidarité Jeunesse — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInca — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssociation des personnes Handicapées — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 118869882:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on La Communaute Du Desert’s filings →