Ormstown, QC · Charitable organization
La Chorale Madrigal
Interprétation de musique chorale lors de concerts collecte de nourriture & dons pour banques alimentaires locales
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHATEAUGUAY VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL | C$500 |
| FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | C$500 |
| ORMSTOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | C$500 |
| LA BOUFFE ADDITIONNELLE | C$125 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$47 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +111% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CVCHATEAUGUAY VALLEY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL3× · 2018–2020 · C$2k · revenue +40%
- LBLa Bouffe Additionnelle4× · 2017–2020 · C$946 · revenue +111%
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2018–2020 · C$187
Funded once
- CVChateauguay Valley Regional High Schoolone grant, 2017 · C$500
- ASAlzheimer Societyone grant, 2017 · C$200 · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.