Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Baie-Comeau, QC · Charitable organization

L'Eveque Catholique Romain de Baie-Comeau

Promouvoir la foi chretienne a travers des services de pastorale selon la religion catholique dans le diocèse de baie-comeau

C$1k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
—
Regions reached
C$250
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$200
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAIDE HAUTE CÔTE NOR MANICOUAGANC$250
CENTRAIDE DUPLESSISC$250
FABRIQUE DE ST JEAN EUDESC$200
COMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE SEPT ILESC$150
COMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE L'ESCALEC$150
TRANSIT SEPT ILESC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$14k · 20 repeat orgsC$570 to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

C$14k
C$270

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
-7%

Still filing today

85%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE CLARKE CITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$3k · revenue +14%
  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE SACRÉ-COEUR
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$888 · revenue +4%
  • FD
    Fabrique de La-Nativité-de-Jésus
    5× · 2017–2021 · C$791 · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CC
    Croix-Rouge canadienne Québec
    one grant, 2018 · C$100 · revenue -7%
  • FL
    Fabrique Longue-Pointe-de-Mingan
    one grant, 2017 · C$50 · revenue -20%
  • FD
    Fabrique de Riviere-au-Tonnerre
    one grant, 2017 · C$50 · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jean-Baptiste
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Angelique
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Famille
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Francois
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Sauveur
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antonin
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jean-Baptiste-De-Nicolet
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Tres-Saint-Sacrement

Église catholique

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Jean-Eudes and the most unlike its peers is The Canadian Red Cross Society / La Societe Canadienne De La Croix-Rouge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
13/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE DE CLARKE CITY — C$3,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetFabrique de St-Jean-Eudes — C$2,447 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION CHEZ NOUS — C$2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFABRIQUE DE SACRÉ-COEUR — C$888 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFabrique de l'Ange-Gardien — C$886 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFabrique de La-Nativité-de-Jésus — C$791 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAIDE DUPLESSIS — C$600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAIDE HAUTE CÔTE NOR MANICOUAGAN — C$600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTransit Sept-Iles — C$300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFabrique de Longue-Rive — C$287 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFABRIQUE DE SACRÉ-COEUR — C$250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFABRIQUE DE LES BUISSONS — C$237 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetFabrique de Les Escoumins — C$230 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSociété des missions étrangères — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE SEPT ILES — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPTOIR ALIMENTAIRE L'ESCALE — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE DE RAGUENEAU — C$125 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFABRIQUE DE PORT-MENIER — C$100 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCroix-Rouge canadienne Québec — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFbbrique de Ste-Anne-de-Portneuf — C$62 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFabrique Longue-Pointe-de-Mingan — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFabrique de Pointe-Lebel — C$50 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFabrique de Riviere-au-Tonnerre — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFabrique de Pentecôte — C$45 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFABRIQUE DE POINTE-AUX-OUTARDES — C$32 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFabrique de Baie Trinité — C$25 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFabrique de Rivier-St-jean — C$13 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Les Frères des Ecoles…Union Canadienne Des …Union Canadienne des …Province de Saint-Jos…United Way East Ontar…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
Les Frères des Ecoles Chrétiennes du Canada FrancophoneQC8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Les Frères des Ecoles Chrétiennes du Canada Francophone · Union Canadienne Des Moniales de L'Ordre de Saint Ursule · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · Province de Saint-Joseph des servantes du Saint-Coeur de Marie · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 129247433:2022-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on L'Eveque Catholique Romain de Baie-Comeau’s filings →