Lachine, QC · Charitable organization
L'Eglise de la Pentecote Rockfield
Preach and teach the gospel of jesus christ.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANADIAN ASSEMBLIES OF GOD | C$2,395 |
| NEW MISSIONS | C$250 |
| DLD MINISTRIES | C$150 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against -83% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$250 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CACANADIAN ASSEMBLIES OF GOD6× · 2017–2024 · C$17k · revenue +50%
- DMDLD Ministries3× · 2017–2024 · C$15k · revenue +73%
- WOWell of Life Canada2× · 2019–2022 · C$2k · revenue +272%
Funded once
- BTBreak Through Ministriesone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -83%
- BOBEARERS OF LOVEone grant, 2022 · C$1k · revenue -88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Missionary activities in philippines
Soulagement de la pauvreté support financier destiné aux enfants d'haiti et d'afrique organisation de voyages missionnaires en haiti
To bring Christianity to places that have not been reached as of yet and to train young people to do the same.
Conducts missionary work in the developing countries
Global missions incorporated is an organization whose mission is the promotion of the gospel and the relief of poverty.
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
Providing basic amenities such as food shelter medical care and clothing to poor children in Haiti.
Missions chez les peuples non-chrétiens au congo en haiti en côte d'ivoire au philippines et au bénin dont les fins sont la religion la charité l'éducation et le bien-être.
Haiti-evangelism church planting leadership development education at primary/secondary/trade school levels run an orphanage and home for impoverished elderly people mexico - evangelism church planting leadership development medical teams.
Mission work in haiti urban mission work in usa church mission work in canada
Maintenir les oeuvres missionnaires au canada à haïti et au japon
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is General conference of the Canadian assemblies of God / Conférence generale des assemblées de Dieu Canadiennes and the most unlike its peers is International Youth Evangelization and Training Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Chapelle Bonne Nouvelle/ Good News Chapel/ Cappella Buona Novella
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.