Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
L'Association Des Églises Des Frères Mennonites de la Province de Québec
Soutien et enseignements aux églises rencontre pour prêcher l'évangile aide financière aux églises et certaines oeuvres paraécclésiatiques internes
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$24k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MULTIPLY | C$10,000 |
| ÉCOLE DE THÉOLOGIE ÉVANGÉLIQUE DU QUÉBEC | C$7,500 |
| CAMP PÉNIEL | C$6,363 |
| CANADIAN CONFERENCE OF MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH OF NORTH AM | C$5,870 |
| MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE CANADA | C$4,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MMULTIPLY7× · 2018–2024 · C$99k · revenue +852%
- CPCAMP PÉNIEL5× · 2017–2024 · C$43k · revenue +92%
- MBMISSION BON ACCUEIL2× · 2019–2023 · C$43k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- CNC2C NETWORK / MULTIPLYone grant, 2017 · C$9k
- BBEYONDone grant, 2017 · C$7k
- CNCOLLÈGE NOTRE DAMEone grant, 2019 · C$6k · revenue +21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prepare students for leadership and ordination for christian minsitry through a 3 year program. containing a major compeonent of field education with course working practical theology and pastoral subjects reflective seminars workshops and…
Prédication évangélisation avancement de la réligion
Church services (including online) Bible studies (including online) Translation of religious materials Training of translators and revisers Training of church workers
Enseignement biblique évangélisation
Theological education & pastoral training in christian & particularly pentecostal beliefs
Une église locale à montréal avec mission de partager l'évangile de jésus-christ à montréal et partout dans le monde. nous avons des réunions le dimanche matin et pendant la semaine. nous avons également des rencontres de prière des études…
Organismes missionnaires et propagation de l'évangile
Training men and women for the united and anglican ordained ministry. providing religious courses for lay people.
Lieu de culte
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mennonite Church Eastern Canada Eglise Mennonite De L'est Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is Collège Notre-Dame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MULTIPLY ↗
- Who funds CAMP PÉNIEL ↗
- Who funds MISSION BON ACCUEIL ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CONFERENCE OF MENNONITE BRETHREN CHURCH OF NORTH AM ↗
- Who funds ÉCOLE DE THÉOLOGIE ÉVANGÉLIQUE DU QUÉBEC ↗
- Who funds MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE CANADA ↗
- Who funds WEST ISLAND MISSION ↗
- Who funds EGLISE WESTSIDE GATHERING ↗
- Who funds COLLÈGE NOTRE DAME ↗
- Who funds POWER AND CHANGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds W.I PRAYER NETWORK/DIRECTION CHRETIENNE ↗
- Who funds Église chrétienne évangélique de Saint-Eustache ↗
- Who funds MENNONITE CHURCH EASTERN CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE MONTREAL COMMUNITY CARES FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.