Lachine, QC · Charitable organization
L'association de L'Église Norvégienne / Norwegian Church Association
Religious services were held on a regular basis.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DANS LA RUE | C$1,000 |
| MAISON SECOURS AUX FEMMES DE MONTREAL | C$1,000 |
| NDG FOOD DEPOT | C$1,000 |
| L'OEYVRE SOUPE MAISON (LACHINE) | C$1,000 |
| COMMUNAUTE HADLEY INC. | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CNCOMMUNAUTE NAZARETH INC8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +139%
- NFNDG FOOD DEPOT7× · 2018–2024 · C$7k · revenue +103%
- DLDANS LA RUE7× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +114%
Funded once
- CRCANADIAN RED CROSSone grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -47%
- TCTHE CEDARS CANCER INSTITUTE AT THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTHone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +10%
- SYSUN YOUTHgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +92%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Soins hospitaliers
Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…
Soins médicaux spécialisés en cardiologie
Aide et support aux personnes sans emploi
Élaborer et proposer des pratiques urbaines contribuant à créer des villes écologiques démocratiques et en santé. l'expertise en matière d'aménagement durable des milieux de vie couvre trois champs : aménager l'environnement urbain pour…
Soins généraux et spécialisée médicaux de courte durée et services de soins de longue durée
Assurer aider conseiller et guider à tout haitien dès son arrivée à montréal un service permenent d'informations d'aide et dépannage.
Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…
Offrir aux participants en démarche de recherche d'emploi ou de formation de l'aide sous forme de bourses ou des titres de transport ou d'autre aide. - offrir un support financier aux organismes sans but lucratif qui viennent en aide à des…
L'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal est un organisme à but non lucratif voué à la recherche biomédicale. l'institut s'est donné pour mission l'amélioration de la santé des individus par la recherche de causes de maladies la…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maison Secours Aux Femmes De Montreal Inc. and the most unlike its peers is CommunautÉ Hadley Inc. Hadley Community Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNAUTE NAZARETH INC ↗
- Who funds NDG FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds DANS LA RUE ↗
- Who funds L'OEUVRE SOUPE MAISON (LACHINE) ↗
- Who funds MAISON SECOURS AUX FEMMES DE MONTREAL INC ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds THE CEDARS CANCER INSTITUTE AT THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SUN YOUTH ↗
- Who funds FONDATION INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTREAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.