Skip to content

Lachine, QC · Charitable organization

L'association de L'Église Norvégienne / Norwegian Church Association

Religious services were held on a regular basis.

C$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$619k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANS LA RUEC$1,000
MAISON SECOURS AUX FEMMES DE MONTREALC$1,000
NDG FOOD DEPOTC$1,000
L'OEYVRE SOUPE MAISON (LACHINE)C$1,000
COMMUNAUTE HADLEY INC.C$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$36k · 5 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +114% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

C$36k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+49%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CN
    COMMUNAUTE NAZARETH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +139%
  • NF
    NDG FOOD DEPOT
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$7k · revenue +103%
  • DL
    DANS LA RUE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • CR
    CANADIAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue -47%
  • TC
    THE CEDARS CANCER INSTITUTE AT THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +10%
  • SY
    SUN YOUTHgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centre Hospitalier De L'universite De Montreal

Soins hospitaliers

—
2
Chu de Québec - Université Laval

Affilié à l'université laval le chu de québec - université laval dispense des soins et des services de santé généraux spécialisés et surspécialisés en y intégrant l'enseignement la recherche clinique et fondamentale et l'évaluation des…

—
3
Institut De Cardiologie De Montreal/Montreal Heart Institute

Soins médicaux spécialisés en cardiologie

—
4
Organisation D'aide Aux Sans-Emploi (O.D.a.S.- Montreal)

Aide et support aux personnes sans emploi

—
5
Les Auxiliaires De L'hopital General De Montreal
—
6
Societe De Developpement Communautaire De Montreal (Sodecm)

Élaborer et proposer des pratiques urbaines contribuant à créer des villes écologiques démocratiques et en santé. l'expertise en matière d'aménagement durable des milieux de vie couvre trois champs : aménager l'environnement urbain pour…

—
7
Centre universitaire de santé McGill / McGill University Health Centre

Soins généraux et spécialisée médicaux de courte durée et services de soins de longue durée

—
8
Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services sociaux de Laval
—
9
Bureau De La CommunautÉ HaÏTienne De MontrÉAl

Assurer aider conseiller et guider à tout haitien dès son arrivée à montréal un service permenent d'informations d'aide et dépannage.

—
10
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
11
Centre D'aide Aux Sans-Emploi Du Sud-Ouest De Montreal

Offrir aux participants en démarche de recherche d'emploi ou de formation de l'aide sous forme de bourses ou des titres de transport ou d'autre aide. - offrir un support financier aux organismes sans but lucratif qui viennent en aide à des…

—
12
Institut De Recherches Cliniques De Montreal

L'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal est un organisme à but non lucratif voué à la recherche biomédicale. l'institut s'est donné pour mission l'amélioration de la santé des individus par la recherche de causes de maladies la…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maison Secours Aux Femmes De Montreal Inc. and the most unlike its peers is CommunautÉ Hadley Inc. Hadley Community Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNAUTE NAZARETH INC — C$8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNDG FOOD DEPOT — C$7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDANS LA RUE — C$7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetL'OEUVRE SOUPE MAISON (LACHINE) — C$7,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetMAISON SECOURS AUX FEMMES DE MONTREAL INC — C$7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN RED CROSS — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CEDARS CANCER INSTITUTE AT THE MCGILL UNIVERSITY HEALTH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUN YOUTH — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION INSTITUT DE CARDIOLOGIE DE MONTREAL — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 886484088:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on L'association de L'Église Norvégienne / Norwegian Church Association’s filings →